首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge
【24h】

Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge

机译:平等主义与公众对社会不平等的认识:以北京交通拥堵为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Egalitarian thought has a long tradition in Chinese history. Synthesized with the socialist ideology, it was practiced nationwide in the first decades of Communist China. Alongside the well-reported quality of life improvements that the recent economic liberalisation reforms have brought about, Chinese people are experiencing an increasingly serious polarization between the rich and the poor. Consequently, an egalitarian tendency has represented itself within contemporary policy and popular discourse.This paper aims to explore how egalitarian thought has influenced public awareness of social inequities by using the case of public attitudes towards the Beijing congestion charge, which is currently still at its planning stage. Nine focus groups, with a total of 73 participants, were undertaken with residents living in different areas of the city. Results show that the perceptions of social inequities are significantly different between low-income and high-income people. Due to egalitarian thinking, low-income people expect the privileges of the rich to be abolished, however, they do not pay much attention to a wider redistribution of wealth and other social resources. By contrast, richer people tend to deny to a wider population the privileges they themselves received, and, to some extent, they are reluctant to accept policy outcomes that may favour those who are in lower social positions. The resentment against the rich, as another by-product of egalitarianism, considerably exaggerates actual social inequalities, thereby intensifying the feelings of being unequally treated.
机译:平等思想在中国历史上具有悠久的历史。它与社会主义意识形态相结合,在共产党中国成立的前几十年在全国范围内得到了实践。最近的经济自由化改革带来了人们普遍认为的生活质量改善,与此同时,中国人民正经历着越来越严重的贫富分化。因此,平均主义倾向已在当代政策和大众话语中体现出来。本文旨在通过使用公众对北京拥堵收费的态度为例,探讨平均主义思想如何影响公众对社会不平等的认识,目前北京尚在计划中阶段。与居住在城市不同地区的居民进行了9个焦点小组的交流,共有73名参与者。结果表明,低收入人群和高收入人群对社会不平等的看法存在显着差异。由于平均主义的思想,低收入人群期望富人的特权被废除,但是他们并不十分注意财富和其他社会资源的更广泛分配。相比之下,富裕的人往往拒绝给更多的人自己获得的特权,并且在某种程度上,他们不愿接受可能有利于处在较低社会地位的人们的政策结果。作为平等主义的副产品,对富人的不满情绪大大夸大了实际的社会不平等,从而加剧了人们受到不平等待遇的感觉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transport policy》 |2019年第2期|47-62|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, 36-40 Univ Rd, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, 36-40 Univ Rd, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, 36-40 Univ Rd, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England;

    Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, 35 Jinxianghe Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China|Eindhoven Univ Technol, Urban Planning Grp, Eindhoven, Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Egalitarian thought; Congestion charge; Social equity; Transport; Beijing;

    机译:平等思想;交通拥堵费;社会公平;交通运输;北京;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号