...
首页> 外文期刊>Transit Australia >Sidelining citizens when deciding on transport projects is asking for trouble
【24h】

Sidelining citizens when deciding on transport projects is asking for trouble

机译:在决定运输项目时让公民无所事事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Citizen engagement is, or should be, central to city planning. When it comes to planning and implementing transport infrastructure the focus tends to be on how to engage the public, when to engage, and what form this should take. But we should be asking another, more important question: how can citizen engagement make infrastructure planning more democratic? In many cases proposed transport infrastructure and the conflicts and debates it provokes are actually about much more than the project proposal. If the project is a new light rail system, for instance, the questions are: Who and what will it serve? What will it look like? And what impacts, positive and negative, will it have on the city over time?
机译:公民参与是或应该在城市规划中处于中心地位。在规划和实施运输基础设施时,重点通常放在如何吸引公众,何时参与以及采取何种形式。但是我们应该问另一个更重要的问题:公民参与如何使基础设施规划更加民主?在许多情况下,拟议的运输基础设施及其引发的冲突和辩论实际上远不止项目提案。例如,如果该项目是新的轻轨系统,那么问题是:它将为谁服务?看起来像什么?随着时间的流逝,它将对这座城市产生积极和消极的影响?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transit Australia》 |2018年第5期|132-132|共1页
  • 作者

    Crystal Legacy;

  • 作者单位

    University of Melbourne;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号