首页> 外文期刊>Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy >E-government adoption in Europe at regional level
【24h】

E-government adoption in Europe at regional level

机译:欧洲在区域一级采用电子政务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The aim of this investigation is to examine the level of adoption of e-government at the regional level in Europe in terms of eight different categories addressing both services provided, internal capacity in terms of training and policies, and perceived barriers to e-government. Design/methodology/approach – A survey approach was employed to achieve the overall aim of the study, based on existing survey instruments and informed by the requirements of policy makers. A survey of 1,021 municipalities across seven European regions was conducted in order to ascertain the development of e-government. Findings – The findings suggest that despite e-government being heavily promoted throughout the Europe, there is relatively little commonality across regions evident to date. The study identifies a number of areas for improvement within the eight categories investigated. Research limitations/implications – The desired minimum confidence level and confidence interval was not realised across all regions. It would be appropriate to conduct further investigations which include larger (non-UK) administrative bodies in order that progress made by comparable organizations may be evaluated. Although the study includes results from municipalities in seven regions, it would be desirable to expand the scope of the investigation. Originality/value – The primary value of this paper lies in the size of the sample derived at regional rather than national level, the resulting data extending our understanding of the adoption of information and communication technologies within municipalities at regional level in Europe.
机译:目的–这项调查的目的是根据八个不同类别来研究欧洲地区政府对电子政务的采用水平,这些类别涉及提供的服务,培训和政策方面的内部能力以及对电子政务的认识障碍。政府。设计/方法/方法–基于现有调查工具并根据决策者的要求,采用了一种调查方法来实现研究的总体目标。为了确定电子政务的发展,对欧洲七个地区的1,021个城市进行了调查。调查结果–调查结果表明,尽管在整个欧洲大力推广电子政务,但迄今为止,各个地区之间的共性相对较少。该研究在所调查的八个类别中确定了许多需要改进的领域。研究的局限性/意义–并非在所有地区都实现了所需的最小置信度和置信区间。进行包括较大(非英国)行政机构在内的进一步调查是适当的,以便可以评估可比组织的进展。尽管研究包括七个地区市政当局的结果,但还是希望扩大调查范围。原创性/价值–本文的主要价值在于在地区而不是国家层面上获得的样本数量,所得数据扩展了我们对欧洲地区层面上市政当局采用信息和通信技术的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号