首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers >Animal maiming, intimacy and the politics of shared life: the bestial and the beastly in eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century England
【24h】

Animal maiming, intimacy and the politics of shared life: the bestial and the beastly in eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century England

机译:动物残废,亲密关系和共同生活的政治:18世纪和19世纪初的英格兰的野兽和野兽

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The everyday lives of many farm workers in eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century England were intricately and often intimately bound with the lives of animals, the ebb and flow of human life being inseparable from that of animal life. Farmyards, fields, folds as well as barns and stables were all spaces where animals transcended being the mere instruments of capital to instead being obvious co-constituents of the rhythms of existence. Living and working in such close proximity meant that the 'species barrier' was crossed and intimacies developed in everyday agricultural practices. Still, the relationship was based upon, if not reducible to, the workings of capital: the animal enrolled as a form of embodied capital, the labourer engaged by the farmer to act upon the animal. And in such relationships intimacies are mirrored by violences: the keeping captive, slaughter, and - occasionally - abuse. In this formative period in which the discourses and policies that continue to inform animal welfare were first formulated, the declining economic and material fortunes of farm workers when juxtaposed to farm animals' fortune as increasingly 'cosseted capital' gave a particular charge to these abuses. Farm animals, and especially horses and cattle, so it is shown, were subjected to a series of violences. Many cases of animal maiming parodied tenderness in their brutality, whilst other attacks on the sexual organs of animals represented complex statements about the ways in which agrarian capitalism regulated all culture. Analysing the changing relationship between humans and animals therefore also helps us to better understand how capitalism mediates - and is mediated by - the non-human as well as the human, and how it defines cultural relations.
机译:在18世纪和19世纪初的英格兰,许多农场工人的日常生活与动物的生活有着错综复杂的联系,而且往往紧密地联系在一起,人类生活的起伏与动物的生活密不可分。农田,田野,褶皱以及谷仓和马s都是动物超越的空间,动物只是资本的简单工具,反而成为生存节奏的明显组成部分。如此紧密地生活和工作,意味着越过了“物种壁垒”,日常农业实践中发展了亲密关系。尽管如此,这种关系还是建立在资本运作的基础上,即使这种资本无法简化:这种动物以一种体现为资本的形式被登记,农民雇用农民来对该动物采取行动。在这种关系中,亲密关系被暴力反映出来:保持俘虏,屠杀和(有时)虐待。在最初形成继续为动物福利提供信息的政策和政策的形成时期,随着越来越多的“固定资本”,农场工人的经济和物质财富与农场动物的财富并存时,其经济和物质财富下降。如图所示,农场动物,尤其是马和牛遭受了一系列暴力。许多动物残害残酷地折磨着温柔的情节,而对动物性器官的其他攻击则代表着对农业资本主义调节所有文化方式的复杂表述。因此,分析人与动物之间不断变化的关系也有助于我们更好地理解资本主义如何介导非人类以及人类以及由其来介导,以及资本主义如何定义文化关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号