首页> 外文期刊>Trains >It's always easier to use someone else's property
【24h】

It's always easier to use someone else's property

机译:使用别人的财产总是更容易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I once worked for a subcabinet official at the Department of Transportation who liked to say, "There are a lot of Socialists out there wearing Capitalist suits." He used the term as an insult to describe people who called themselves Capitalists but thought the taxpayers owed them a profit. I was reminded of that in a recent exchange with a subscriber, a transportation consultant who thinks Class I railroads should let short lines use their physical plant for little more than the avoidable cost of using those facilities―that is, the cost of wear and tear caused by the short line. The consultant proposes this as a solution for those short lines whose track cannot accommodate cars of 286,000 lb. gross weight, which have become the de facto standard for most bulk business Instead of these short lines upgrading their track (which isn't cost-effective, or it would have happened already), he thinks Class I railroads should be forced to grant short lines access to their network and allow the short lines to deliver the cars themselves. In effect, he proposes that the government direct Class Is to superimpose a short-line operated 263,000 lb. car network on top of their own 286,000 lb. car network. This is called "competitive access," an oxymoron by any name.
机译:我曾经在交通运输部的一个副驾驶室工作过,他喜欢说:“外面有很多社会主义者穿着资本主义西装。”他用侮辱这个词来形容那些自称资本家但认为纳税人欠他们利润的人。提醒我的是,最近与一位订户交换信息时,一位运输顾问认为一类铁路应该让短线使用其物理设备,而其使用成本仅比使用这些设施可避免的成本高,即损耗成本由短线引起。该顾问建议将其作为解决方案,以解决那些无法容纳总重28.6万磅的汽车的短线的问题,这些短线已经成为大多数散货企业的事实上的标准,而不是这些短线提升了他们的赛道(这并不划算) ,或者可能已经发生了),他认为,一级铁路应被强制允许短线进入其网络,并允许短线自行交付汽车。实际上,他提议由政府直接管理的Class I将短线运营的263,000磅汽车网络叠加在自己的286,000磅汽车网络之上。这被称为“竞争性访问”,这是任何形式的矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号