首页> 外文学位 >The uneasy case for intellectual property.
【24h】

The uneasy case for intellectual property.

机译:知识产权问题不安。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the question of how to protect and encourage the products of the mind is not new, never has it been more in contention than in today's digital age. This work is a philosophical investigation of the concept of intellectual property. It discovers enough divergence within the literature to cast doubt upon the appropriateness of treating intellectual property as a species of traditional property. Most of the difficulties hinge on a fundamental existential difference between traditional property and intellectual property: where traditional property is a scarce resource, intellectual property cannot be described as such. Furthermore, empirical and mathematical studies have been unable to show that the protection of the products of the mind as property is universally effective in encouraging creativity and innovation. Given this, the work suggests two proposals for the way forward and offers several alternative metaphors to the property conceptualization of intellectual property.
机译:尽管如何保护和鼓励思想产物并不是一个新问题,但在当今的数字时代,它的争论从未如此激烈。这项工作是对知识产权概念的哲学研究。它在文献中发现了足够多的分歧,使人们对将知识产权视为传统财产的一种适当性产生怀疑。大多数困难取决于传统财产与知识产权之间的根本存在差异:在传统财产是一种稀缺资源的情况下,知识产权就不能这样描述。此外,经验和数学研究还不能证明保护作为财产的心理产物在鼓励创造力和创新方面普遍有效。鉴于此,这项工作提出了两个建议,提出了前进的方向,并为知识产权的财产概念化提供了一些替代性的隐喻。

著录项

  • 作者

    Collins, Gemma.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Political Science General.;Intellectual Property.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 88 p.
  • 总页数 88
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号