首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change
【24h】

The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change

机译:烟草法规的未来:对基本制度变革提案的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is much debate about the future of tobacco regulation. Some have argued that to achieve maximum possible reduction in the harm tobacco causes, new regulatory models that involve fundamental institutional change must be adopted. The tobacco industry will continue to undermine tobacco control, and, so it is argued, we must change the way in which it operates if we are to be able to make the necessary progress. Such proposals may have an immediate appeal, especially for those frustrated that progress in tobacco control is not as rapid as they would hope—with all the avoidable loss of life and livelihoods that that entails—but they need to be carefully analysed and assessed, and much thought must be applied before spending time and resources advocating for them. One such proposal, advanced by Borland, involves the establishment of a monopsonistic statutory purchasing agency and wholesale distributor of tobacco products. Borland argues the relative benefits of such a model as compared to a more "conventional" model. On close examination, the benefits of the Borland proposal, as compared to the conventional model, appear overstated, and the Borland proposal introduces significant regulatory problems. There is still much that can be achieved in tobacco regulation through more conventional approaches, and within the "existing system". We should be wary of allowing the understandable allure of new or radical approaches to distract us from this reality.
机译:关于烟草监管的未来有很多争论。一些人认为,为了最大程度地减少烟草造成的危害,必须采用涉及根本性制度变革的新监管模式。烟草业将继续破坏烟草控制,因此,有人认为,如果我们要取得必要的进步,就必须改变其运作方式。这些建议可能会立即引起人们的注意,尤其是对于那些沮丧的人们,他们对控烟的进展并不如他们希望的那样快,因为随之而来的是所有可避免的生命和生计损失,但是需要仔细地分析和评估它们,在花时间和资源为他们辩护之前,必须多加考虑。由Borland提出的一项这样的提议涉及建立一个垄断性的法定购买机构和烟草制品的批发分销商。 Borland认为,与更“常规”的模型相比,这种模型的相对优势。经过仔细检查,与传统模型相比,Borland提案的好处似乎被夸大了,并且Borland提案引入了重大的监管问题。通过更常规的方法并在“现有系统”内,在烟草监管中仍然可以实现很多目标。我们应该警惕允许新的或激进的方法引起人们的理解,从而使我们偏离这一现实。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2006年第4期|p.333-338|共6页
  • 作者

    Jonathan Liberman;

  • 作者单位

    VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, 100 Drummond Street, Carlton 3053, Victoria, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 轻工业、手工业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号