首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment
【24h】

Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment

机译:卷烟和电子烟中应禁止使用香料吗?来自离散选择实验的成年吸烟者和最近戒烟者的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To provide the policy-relevant estimates of impacts of alternative flavour bans on preferences and demand for cigarettes and e-cigarettes in adult smokers and recent quitters.A best–best discrete choice experiment (DCE) is used to elicit smokers’ and recent quitters’ preferences for flavours, price, health impact and nicotine level in cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Choice of tobacco products and an opt-out option were examined. An efficient design yielded 36 choice sets. Exploded logit choice models were estimated. Flavour bans are modelled by restricting flavour coefficients in the estimated model.A sample of 2031 adult smokers and recent quitters was recruited to complete an online survey and DCE.Current smokers and recent quitters, on average, prefer cigarettes and menthol cigarettes over flavoured e-cigarettes. However, there is substantial preference heterogeneity by younger adults (ages 18–25), race/ethnicity and respondents with higher education. Our predictions suggest that a ban on menthol cigarettes would produce the greatest reduction in the choice of cigarettes (−5.2%), but with an accompanying increase in e-cigarettes use (3.8%). In contrast, banning flavours in e-cigarettes, while allowing menthol in cigarettes would result in the greatest increase in the selection of cigarettes (8.3%), and a decline in the use of e-cigarettes (−11.1%). A ban on all flavours, but tobacco in both products would increase ‘opting-out’ the most (5.2%) but would also increase choice of cigarettes (2.7%) and decrease choice of e-cigarettes (−7.9%).A ban on flavoured e-cigarettes alone would likely increase the choice of cigarettes in smokers, arguably the more harmful way of obtaining nicotine, whereas a ban on menthol cigarettes alone would likely be more effective in reducing the choice of cigarettes. A ban on all flavours in both products would likely reduce the smoking/vaping rates, but the use of cigarettes would be higher than in the status quo. Policy-makers should use these results to guide the choice of flavour bans in light of their stance on the potential health impacts both products.
机译:为了提供与政策相关的估计,以替代口味禁令对成年吸烟者和近期戒烟者的香烟和电子烟的偏好和需求的影响。采用最佳最佳离散选择实验(DCE)来吸引吸烟者和近期戒烟者。香烟和电子烟的口味,价格,健康影响和尼古丁含量的偏爱。研究了烟草产品的选择和退出选择。高效的设计产生了36个选择集。估计了爆炸的logit选择模型。通过限制估计模型中的香气系数来模拟香精禁令.2033名成年吸烟者和最近戒烟者的样本被招募完成在线调查和DCE。当前吸烟者和最近戒烟者平均比香烟和薄荷醇更喜欢香烟和薄荷醇香烟。但是,年轻人(18-25岁),种族/民族和受过高等教育的受访者存在很大的偏好异质性。我们的预测表明,禁止薄荷卷烟会最大程度地减少卷烟的选择(-5.2%),但随之而来的是电子烟使用量的增加(3.8%)。相反,禁止电子烟中的香料,同时允许香烟中的薄荷醇,将导致香烟选择的最大增加(8.3%)和电子烟使用的减少(-11.1%)。禁止所有口味,但是两种产品中的烟草都会增加最大的``选择退出''率(5.2%),但也会增加卷烟的选择率(2.7%)和减少电子烟的选择率(−7.9%)。仅在加香的电子烟上吸烟可能会增加吸烟者对香烟的选择,这可能是获得尼古丁的更有害的方式,而仅对薄荷醇香烟的禁令在减少香烟选择方面可能更有效。禁止两种产品中所有口味的香料都可能会降低吸烟/吸烟率,但香烟的使用量将高于现状。政策制定者应根据这些结果对两种产品潜在的健康影响的立场,使用这些结果来指导香精禁令的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号