...
首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Society >University expansion and the knowledge society
【24h】

University expansion and the knowledge society

机译:大学扩张与知识社会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For centuries, the processes of social differentiation associated with Modernity have often been thought to intensify the need for site-specific forms of role training and knowledge production, threatening the university’s survival either through fragmentation or through failure to adapt. Other lines of argument emphasize the extent to which the Modern system creates and relies on an integrated knowledge system, but most of the literature stresses functional differentiation and putative threats to the university. And yet over this period the university has flourished. In our view, this seeming paradox is explained by the fact that modern society rests as much on universalistic cosmological bases as it does on differentiation. The university expands over recent centuries because – as it has from its religious origins – it casts cultural and human materials in universalistic terms. Our view helps explain empirical phenomena that confound standard accounts: the university’s extraordinary expansion and global diffusion, its curricular and structural isomorphism, and its relatively unified structure. All of this holds increasingly true after World War II, as national state societies made up of citizens are increasingly embedded in a world society constituted of empowered individuals. The redefinition of society in global and individual terms reduces nationally bounded models of nature and culture, extends the pool of university beneficiaries and investigators, and empowers the human persons who are understood to root it all. The changes intensify universalization and the university’s rate of worldwide growth. For the university’s knowledge and “knowers,” and for the pedagogy that joins them together, the implications are many. The emerging societal context intensifies longstanding processes of cultural rationalization and ontological elaboration, yielding great expansions in what can and should be known, and in who can and should know. These changes in turn alter the menu of approved techniques for joining knowledge and knower as one. The “knowledge society” that results is distinguished by the extraordinary degree to which the university is linked to society. But it is also distinguished by the degree to which society is organized around the university’s abstracted and universalized understandings of the world and its degree-certified graduates.
机译:几个世纪以来,人们经常认为与现代性相关的社会分化过程会加剧对特定场所形式的角色培训和知识生产的需求,通过分裂或不适应而威胁大学的生存。其他论点则强调了现代系统在多大程度上创建并依赖于一个集成的知识体系,但是大多数文献都强调了功能差异和对大学的假定威胁。然而在这段时期,大学蓬勃发展。我们认为,这种看似矛盾的现象可以解释为这样一个事实,即现代社会既依赖于普遍性的宇宙学基础,也依赖于分化的基础。该大学在过去几个世纪中得到了扩展,因为它-从其宗教渊源出发-以普世主义的眼光铸造文化和人类材料。我们的观点有助于解释混淆标准账户的经验现象:大学的非凡扩张和全球扩散,课程和结构同构以及相对统一的结构。在第二次世界大战之后,所有这些都越来越适用,因为由公民组成的国家国家社会越来越多地融入由有能力的个人组成的世界社会中。从全球和个人角度重新定义社会,减少了国家限制的自然和文化模式,扩大了大学受益者和调查人员的范围,并赋予了被认为能够扎根一切的人类权力。这些变化加剧了普遍性和大学的全球增长率。对于大学的知识和“知识”,以及将他们结合在一起的教学法,其影响是很多的。新兴的社会背景加剧了文化合理化和本体论阐述的长期过程,在可以知道和应该知道的以及谁可以知道和应该知道的方面产生了巨大的扩展。这些改变反过来改变了认可的知识和知识作为一体的技术菜单。所产生的“知识社会”以大学与社会联系的非凡程度而著称。但这也以社会对大学及其对世界及其学位认证的毕业生的抽象和普遍理解的组织程度而著称。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Theory and Society 》 |2007年第4期| 287-311| 共25页
  • 作者单位

    Sociology Department, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA;

    Sociology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号