首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Society >Educate or serve: the paradox of “professional service” and the image of the west in legitimacy battles of post-socialist advertising
【24h】

Educate or serve: the paradox of “professional service” and the image of the west in legitimacy battles of post-socialist advertising

机译:教育或服务:后社会主义广告合法性斗争中“专业服务”的悖论和西方形象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article investigates a puzzle in the rapidly evolving profession of advertising in post-socialist Hungary: young professionals who came of age during the shift to market-driven practices want to produce advertising that is uncompromised by clients and consumers, and to educate others about western modernity. It is their older colleagues—trained during customer-hostile socialism—who emphasize that good professionals serve their clients’ needs. These unexpected generational positions show that 1) professions are more than groups expanding their jurisdiction. They are fields structured by two conflicting demands: autonomy of expertise and dependence on clients. We can explain the puzzle by noting that actors are positioning themselves on one or the other side based on their trajectory or movement in the field relative to other actors. Old and new groups vie for power in the transforming post-socialist professional field, responding to each other’s claims and vulnerabilities, exploiting the professional field’s contradictory demands on its actors. 2) The struggle is not between those who are oriented to the west and those that are not. Rather, the west is both the means and the stake of the struggle over historical continuity and professional power. Imposing a definition of the west is almost the same as imposing a definition of the profession on the field. In this historical case, “field” appears less as a stable structure based on actors’ equipment with capital, than as dynamic relations moved forward by contestation of the field’s relevant capital.
机译:本文调查了后社会主义匈牙利迅速发展的广告专业中的一个难题:在转向市场驱动的实践过程中成年的年轻专业人士希望制作不受客户和消费者影响的广告,并向其他人宣传西方现代性。是他们的老同事,他们在客户敌对的社会主义时期接受了培训,他们强调,优秀的专业人员可以满足客户的需求。这些意想不到的世代立场表明:1)职业不仅仅是扩大其管辖范围的群体。它们是由两个相互矛盾的需求构成的领域:专业知识的自主性和对客户的依赖。我们可以通过指出演员根据其相对于其他演员的运动轨迹或运动位置将自己置于一侧或另一侧来解释这个难题。新老团体争相在变革中的后社会主义专业领域寻求力量,回应彼此的主张和脆弱性,利用专业领域对其演员的矛盾要求。 2)斗争不在那些面向西方的人与那些不面向西方的人之间。相反,西方既是在历史连续性和专业力量上进行斗争的手段,也是其利益所在。对西方强加一个定义与在该领域强加对该职业的定义几乎相同。在这种历史性的情况下,“领域”看起来不像是基于演员装备的具有资本的稳定结构,而是动态关系随着领域相关资本的竞争而向前发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Theory and Society》 |2010年第2期|203-243|共41页
  • 作者

    Zsuzsanna Vargha;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University, New York, NY, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:18:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号