首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Society >Jurisdiction, inscription, and state formation: administrative modernism and knowledge regimes
【24h】

Jurisdiction, inscription, and state formation: administrative modernism and knowledge regimes

机译:管辖权,题词和国家形成:行政现代主义和知识体系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In seventeenth-century France, Colbert built a more effective state administration not by rationalizing state offices but by using public documents to increase the government’s intellectual capacity to exercise logistical power and engage in territorial governance. This pattern calls into question Weber’s model of the genesis of “modern officialdom,” suggesting that its source was not social rationalization, but rather the identification and management of expertise. Colbert recruited into government nascent technocrats with knowledge useful to territorial politics, using contracts and other documents to limit their independence and subordinate them to patrimonial authorities. They exercised specific duties and impersonal powers in jurisdictional areas—much like modern technocrats. Their expertise enhanced the intellectual capacity of the administration to exercise territorial power and made the state less dependent on patrimonial clienteles without challenging the patrimonial culture of power/knowledge.
机译:在十七世纪的法国,科尔伯特建立了一个更有效的国家行政机构,而不是通过合理化国家机构,而是通过使用公共文件来提高政府行使后勤权和进行领土管理的知识能力。这种模式使韦伯对“现代官场”起源的模型提出了质疑,表明其来源不是社会合理化,而是专业知识的识别和管理。科尔伯特通过对合同和其他文件的使用限制了其独立性并将其从属于世袭制,从而吸收了对领土政治有用的知识的政府新生技术专家。他们在司法管辖区行使特定的职责和非人格权力,就像现代技术官僚一样。他们的专长增强了行政部门行使领地权力的知识能力,使国家在不挑战世袭权力/知识文化的情况下减少了对世袭客户的依赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号