首页> 外文期刊>Theory and Decision >Are groups 'less behavioral'? The case of anchoring
【24h】

Are groups 'less behavioral'? The case of anchoring

机译:群体“行为较少”吗?锚定的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Economic small group research points to groups as more rational decision-makers in numerous economic situations. However, no attempts have been made to investigate whether groups are affected similarly by behavioral biases that are pervasive for individuals. If groups were also able to more effectively avoid these biases, the relevance of biases in actual economic contexts dominated by group decision-making might be questioned. We consider the case of anchoring as a prime example of a well-established, robust bias. Individual and group biasedness in three economically relevant domains are compared: factual knowledge, probability estimates and price valuations. In contrast to previous anchoring studies, we find groups to successfully reduce, albeit not eliminate, anchoring in the factual knowledge domain. For the other two domains, groups and individuals are equally biased by external anchors. Group cooperation thus reduces biases for predominantly intellective tasks only, while no such reduction is achieved when judgmental aspects are involved.
机译:经济小组研究指出,在许多经济情况下,小组是更理性的决策者。但是,尚未尝试调查群体是否受到普遍存在于个人的行为偏见的影响。如果群体也能够更有效地避免这些偏见,那么人们可能会质疑这种偏见在以群体决策为主导的实际经济环境中的相关性。我们认为锚定的情况是公认的稳健偏见的主要示例。比较了三个与经济相关的领域中的个人和群体偏见:事实知识,概率估计和价格估值。与先前的锚定研究相比,我们发现小组成功地减少了(尽管不是消除)了事实知识领域中的锚定。对于其他两个领域,群体和个人同样受到外部锚的偏见。因此,小组合作只能减少对主要智力任务的偏见,而当涉及判断方面时,则无法实现这种减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号