首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Ecology >Turn designation, sampling rate and the misidentification of power laws in movement path data using maximum likelihood estimates
【24h】

Turn designation, sampling rate and the misidentification of power laws in movement path data using maximum likelihood estimates

机译:使用最大似然估计在移动路径数据中的转弯指定,采样率和功率定律的错误识别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many authors have claimed to observe animal movement paths that appear to be Lévy walks, i.e. a random walk where the distribution of move lengths follows an inverse power law. A Lévy walk is known to be the optimal search strategy of a particular class of random walks in certain environments; hence, it is important to distinguish correctly between Lévy walks and other types of random walks in observed animal movement paths. Evidence of a power law distribution in the step length distribution of observed animal movement paths is often used to classify a particular movement path as a Lévy walk. However, there is some doubt about the accuracy of early studies that apparently found Lévy walk behaviour. A recently accepted method to determine whether a movement path truly exhibits Lévy walk behaviour is based on an analysis of move lengths with a maximum likelihood estimate using Akaike weights. Here, we show that simulated (non-Lévy) random walks representing different types of animal movement behaviour (a composite correlated random walk; pooled data from a set of random walks with different levels of correlation and three-dimensional correlated random walks projected into one dimension) can all show apparent power law behaviour typical of Lévy walks when using the maximum likelihood estimation method. The probability of the movement path being identified as having a power law step distribution is related to both the sampling rate used by the observer and the way that ‘turns’ or ‘reorientations’ in the movement path are designated. However, identification is also dependent on the nature and properties of the simulated path, and there is currently no standard method of observation and analysis that is robust for all cases. Our results indicate that even apparently robust maximum likelihood methods can lead to a mismatch between pattern and process, as paths arising from non-Lévy walks exhibit Lévy-like patterns.
机译:许多作者声称观察到的动物运动路径似乎是Lévy行走,即随机行走,其中运动长度的分布遵循反幂定律。在某些环境中,Lévy漫步是特定类别的随机漫步的最佳搜索策略。因此,重要的是在观察到的动物运动路径上正确区分Lévy行走和其他类型的随机行走。在观察到的动物运动路径的步长分布中,幂律分布的证据通常用于将特定运动路径分类为Lévy行走。但是,对于早期发现Lévy步行行为的研究的准确性存在一些疑问。最近使用的一种确定运动路径是否真正表现出Lévy行走行为的方法是基于对运动长度的分析,并使用Akaike权重进行最大似然估计。在这里,我们显示了代表不同类型动物运动行为的模拟(非莱维)随机游走(复合相关随机游走;来自一组具有不同相关度的随机游走的合并数据,以及与三维相关的随机游走被投影到一个使用最大似然估计方法时,都可以表现出Lévy行走典型的视在幂律行为。将移动路径识别为具有幂律阶跃分布的概率与观察者使用的采样率以及在移动路径中指定“转弯”或“重新定向”的方式有关。但是,识别也取决于模拟路径的性质和特性,并且目前没有适用于所有情况的可靠的观察和分析标准方法。我们的结果表明,即使表面上鲁棒的最大似然方法也可能导致模式与过程之间的不匹配,因为非Lévy步行产生的路径表现出Lévy样的模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号