首页> 外文期刊>The Political Quarterly >'Democratic Socialism' and the Concept of (Post) Capitalism
【24h】

'Democratic Socialism' and the Concept of (Post) Capitalism

机译:“民主社会主义”和(邮政)资本主义的概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores the 'democratic socialism' being proposed by new left movements on either side of the Atlantic, and evaluates its claim to be a form of anti- or postcapitalism. It argues that in the democratic socialist worldview, the line between capitalism and socialism rests on the balance of power between workers and capitalists in the economic sphere. While traditional social democracy seeks to redistribute wealth but leaves relations between workers and capitalists within firms untouched, democratic socialism seeks to abolish private property in the economic sphere. Production is controlled democratically by the workers themselves, in league with a workers' state. The article critically appraises the claim that such a scenario constitutes a form of postcapitalism. Drawing on the work of critical Marxists such as Moishe Postone, it argues that capitalism is not primarily defined by private property relations in the economic sphere, but rather the peculiar social form of capitalist labour. Unlike in pre-capitalist societies, for labour in capitalism to secure a continued basis on which to reproduce the means of subsistence, it must be socially validated as 'value-producing'. The criteria for value validation is not set in the workplace, or within a single nation state, but rather on the world market. The article concludes that, for all its merits, the democratisation of workplaces does not overcome the need for this social validation, but rather constitutes an alternative form of managing the process of production in this context. As such, democratic socialism, like social democracy, remains susceptible to the same imperatives and crises as other forms of capitalist production, and so cannot be said to constitute a form of 'postcapitalism'.
机译:本文探讨了大西洋两侧的新左转运动提出了“民主社会主义”,并评估其声称是抗议者或止损性主义的形式。它认为,在民主社会主义世界观,资本主义与社会主义之间的界限依赖于经济领域的工人和资本家之间的权力平衡。虽然传统的社会民主寻求重新分配财富,但留下工人和资本家之间的关系,在不受影交的公司内,民主社会主义旨在废除经济领域的私有财产。生产由工人本身以民主党为民主的控制,与工人国家联盟。文章批判性地评估了这种情况构成了一种职位主义的形式。借鉴Moishe Postone等关键马克思主义者的工作,据称资本主义并没有主要由经济领域的私有财产关系定义,而是资本主义劳动力的特殊社会形式。与资本预先主义的社会不同,为了资本主义的劳动力,以确保持续的依据复制生存手段,必须是社会验证为“产值”。价值验证的标准未在工作场所或单一国家,而是在世界市场上设置。本文的结论是,对于所有优点,工作场所的民主化不会克服对这种社会验证的需求,而是构成在这种背景下管理生产过程的替代形式。因此,像社会民主一样,民主社会主义仍然易于与其他形式的资本主义生产相同的必要任务和危机,因此不能说是构成一种“职能主义”的形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号