...
首页> 外文期刊>The Motor ship >LNG conversions raise legal issues
【24h】

LNG conversions raise legal issues

机译:液化天然气转换引发法律问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the modern regulatory landscape, old technologies, equipment and infrastructure on ships often require overhaul. For shipowners with vessels operating in the recently-introduced ECAs, for example, running vessels on heavy fuel oil (HFO) alone is no longer an option. Although switching to more expensive distillate fuels is one way to achieve regulatory compliance, and fitting scrubbers is another option, many shipowners are coming to the conclusion that, depending on the characteristics of the vessel and the routes that it operates, converting the vessel to run on LNG may be the most attractive long-term solution. That said, legal issues with such conversions may catch out the unwary. In some ways, a contract for the conversion of an existing ship is more complex than for the build of a LNG-fuelled vessel from scratch. For instance, standard form contracts for newbuildings are widely used in the industry, meaning that the yard and the shipowner have a template for the project that may simply require fine-tuning. No such standard form contract exists for ship conversions. As a consequence, the contractor and shipowner must pay close attention to whether or not every key issue has been dealt with in the contract.
机译:在现代监管环境中,船舶上的旧技术,设备和基础设施经常需要大修。例如,对于拥有在最近引入的ECA中运行的船舶的船东而言,不再仅靠重油(HFO)来运行船舶。尽管转向更昂贵的馏出燃料是达到法规遵从性的一种方法,而安装洗涤塔是另一种选择,但许多船东得出的结论是,根据船舶的特性和营运路线,将船舶转换为可运行状态液化天然气可能是最有吸引力的长期解决方案。也就是说,进行此类转换的法律问题可能会引起关注。在某些方面,与从头建造LNG燃料船相比,现有船体的改装合同要复杂得多。例如,新造船的标准形式合同在该行业中得到了广泛使用,这意味着船厂和船东拥有该项目的模板,而这些模板可能只需要进行微调即可。没有此类标准格式合同可用于船舶改装。因此,承包商和船东必须密切注意合同中是否处理了所有关键问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号