首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Psychology >Predicting Community Opposition to Inclusion in Schools: The Role of Social Dominance, Contact, Intergroup Anxiety, and Economic Conservatism
【24h】

Predicting Community Opposition to Inclusion in Schools: The Role of Social Dominance, Contact, Intergroup Anxiety, and Economic Conservatism

机译:预测社区对学校的反对意见:社会优势,接触,群体间焦虑和经济保守主义的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study addresses community members' attitudes toward inclusion, the practice of including students with disabilities in regular education classroom settings. Participants in Study 1 were 271 community adults, completing measures of prior contact with people with disabilities, social dominance orientation (SDO), economic conservatism, intergroup anxiety, prejudice, and opposition to inclusion. Results from structural equation modeling indicated that amount of intergroup anxiety predicted opposition to inclusion via the mediator, prejudice toward people with disabilities, and that amount of prior contact indirectly predicted prejudice toward people with disabilities through intergroup anxiety. SDO positively predicted both intergroup anxiety and prejudice in the model, with prejudice also mediating between SDO and opposition to inclusion. Both SDO and economic conservatism failed to exhibit direct predictive relationships with opposition to inclusion. Participants in Study 2 were 161 community adults. Contact was shown to exert an indirect effect on prejudice via intergroup anxiety, whereas intergroup anxiety impacted inclusive attitudes via prejudice. SDO exerted both direct and indirect (via prejudice) effects on opposition to inclusion. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:这项研究解决了社区成员对融合的态度,即将残疾学生纳入常规教育教室的做法。研究1的参与者为271名社区成人,完成了与残疾人的事先接触,社会支配倾向(SDO),经济保守主义,群体间焦虑,偏见和反对包容的措施。结构方程模型的结果表明,群体间的焦虑量通过介体预测了对包容的反对,对残疾人的偏见,而事先接触的数量间接地通过群体间的焦虑预示了对残疾人的偏见。 SDO积极地预测了模型中的群体间焦虑和偏见,偏见也在SDO和反对包容之间进行了调解。 SDO和经济保守主义都没有表现出与包容性相反的直接预测关系。研究2的参与者为161位社区成人。事实证明,接触会通过群体间的焦虑对偏见产生间接影响,而群体间的焦虑会通过偏见影响包容性态度。 SDO对反对包容性具有直接和间接的影响(通过偏见)。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Psychology》 |2010年第2期|p.121-144|共24页
  • 作者单位

    H. MICHAEL CROWSONJOYCE A. BRANDESUniversity of OklahomaAddress correspondence to H. Michael Crowson, 820 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019- 2041, USA, mcrowson@ou.edu (e-mail).AUTHOR NOTESH. Michael Crowson is an associate professor in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Oklahoma in Norman. His research interests include the roles of personality, development, and ideology in the prediction of sociopolitical attitudes and behaviors. Joyce A. Brandes is an assistant professor at the University of Oklahoma in Norman. Her current research interests are inclusion of individuals with disabilities in educational and community environments, preservice education, autism, and literacy.,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号