首页> 外文期刊>The Gerontologist >Nursing Assistants' Job Commitment: Effect of Nursing Home Organizational Factors and Impact on Resident Well-Being
【24h】

Nursing Assistants' Job Commitment: Effect of Nursing Home Organizational Factors and Impact on Resident Well-Being

机译:护理助理的工作承诺:疗养院组织因素的影响及其对居民幸福感的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate (a) whether certified nursing assistants (CNAs) are more committed to nursing home jobs when they perceive their jobs as enhanced (greater autonomy, use of knowledge, teamwork), and (b) whether CNA job commitment affects resident satisfaction. Design and Methods: A qualitative exploration of management philosophy and practice and of CNAs' views of their jobs in 18 Massachusetts nursing homes formed the basis for a survey administered to 255 CNAs in 15 homes. A quality-of-life questionnaire was administered to 105 residents. Logistic regression accounting for clustering estimated the effect of personal characteristics, satisfaction with tangible job rewards, and aspects of job design on CNAs' intent to stay in current jobs. A general linear model estimated the effect of job commitment on residents' satisfaction with their relationship to nursing staff. Results: After we accounted for satisfaction with wages, benefits, and advancement opportunities, good basic supervision was most important in affecting CNAs' intent to stay in their jobs. Job enhancements were not significantly related to intent to stay. Residents were more satisfied with their relationships to nursing staff and their quality of life on units where a higher proportion of CNAs were committed to their jobs. Implications: The finding that greater job commitment of CNAs is associated with better quality of relationships and life for residents implies that better jobs lead to better care. Culture change transformation that increases CNA autonomy, knowledge input, and teamwork may not increase workers' commitment to jobs without improvements in basic supervision. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:目的:本研究的目的是调查(a)当认证的护理助理(CNA)认为自己的工作有所增强时(更大的自主权,知识的运用,团队合作),是否更致力于家庭护理工作;以及(b)是否CNA的工作承诺会影响居民的满意度。设计和方法:对马萨诸塞州18个疗养院的管理理念和实践以及CNA对工作的看法进行了定性探索,构成了对15个疗养院中255个CNA进行调查的基础。对105位居民进行了生活质量问卷调查。聚类的逻辑回归分析估计了个人特征,对有形工作报酬的满意度以及工作设计方面对CNA留在当前工作的意图的影响。一个通用的线性模型估计工作承诺对居民对其与护理人员关系的满意度的影响。结果:在我们考虑了对工资,福利和晋升机会的满意度之后,良好的基本监督对于影响CNA留职的意图至关重要。工作的增加与停留的意图没有明显的关系。居民对与护理人员的关系以及生活在CNA比例较高的单位的生活质量更加满意。启示:发现CNA的更大工作承诺与居民关系和生活质量的提高相关,这意味着更好的工作可以带来更好的护理。如果不改善基本监管,增加CNA自主权,知识输入和团队合作精神的文化变革转型可能不会增加工人对工作的承诺。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Gerontologist》 |2008年第s1期|p.36-45|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Christine E. Bishop, PhD,1 Dana Beth Weinberg, PhD,2 Walter Leutz, PhD,1 Almas Dossa, PhD, MPH,3 Susan G. Pfefferle, PhD, MEd,4 and Rebekah M. Zincavage, MA1The research reported here was supported by Grant 049224 from Atlantic Philanthropies and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation under the Better Jobs Better Care program project.Susan Eaton, PhD, inspired the proposal and study design for this project and was its co-principal investigator. Susan was devoted to making nursing homes better places to live and work, and to supporting frontline worker voice. Her death in December 2003 left an irreparable void in our project team. It is our hope that our work on this project has authentically embodied her thinking and her spirit. This article is dedicated to her memory.We are grateful for the insight, support, and advice of project officers Debra Lipson and Natasha Bryant;

    senior co-investigators Lisa Dodson and Jody Hoffer Gittell, who led site and analysis teams and enriched our thinking with their perspectives;

    team members Melissa Morley, Emily Sandahl, and Joanne Jannsen;

    other Better Jobs Better Care grantees;

    and Barbara Frank and Barbara Whalen. This project would not have been possible without the support of the management and staff of the 18 Massachusetts nursing homes who opened their doors to our inquiry.Address correspondence to Christine E. Bishop, PhD, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Brandeis University, Mailstop 035, 415 South Street, P.O. Box 549110, Waltham, MA 02454-9110. E-mail: bishop@brandeis.edu1 Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.2 Department of Sociology, Queens College-City University of New York, Flushing.3 Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA.4 Center for Mental Health Services Research, The George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号