首页> 外文期刊>Tellus >Comparison of initial perturbation methods for the mesoscale ensemble prediction system of the Meteorological Research Institute for the WWRP Beijing 2008 Olympics Research and Development Project (B08RDP)
【24h】

Comparison of initial perturbation methods for the mesoscale ensemble prediction system of the Meteorological Research Institute for the WWRP Beijing 2008 Olympics Research and Development Project (B08RDP)

机译:WWRP北京2008年奥运会研究与开发项目(B08RDP)气象研究所中尺度集合预报系统的初始扰动方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Different initial perturbation methods for the mesoscale ensemble prediction were compared by the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) as a part of the intercomparison of mesoscale ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) of the World Weather Research Programme (WWRP) Beijing 2008 Olympics Research and Development Project (B08RDP). Five initial perturbation methods for mesoscale ensemble prediction were developed for B08RDP and compared at MRI: (1) a downscaling method of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)'s operational one-week EPS (WEP), (2) a targeted global model singular vector (GSV) method, (3) a mesoscale model singular vector (MSV) method based on the adjoint model of the JMA non-hydrostatic model (NHM), (4) a mesoscale breeding growing mode (MBD) method based on the NHM forecast and (5) a local ensemble transform (LET) method based on the local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) using NHM. These perturbation methods were applied to the preliminary experiments of the B08RDP Tier-1 mesoscale ensemble prediction with a horizontal resolution of 15 km. To make the comparison easier, the same horizontal resolution (40 km) was employed for the three mesoscale model-based initial perturbation methods (MSV, MBD and LET). The GSV method completely outperformed the WEP method, confirming the advantage of targeting in mesoscale EPS. The GSV method generally performed well with regard to root mean square errors of the ensemble mean, large growth rates of ensemble spreads throughout the 36-h forecast period, and high detection rates and high Brier skill scores (BSSs) for weak rains. On the other hand, the mesoscale model-based initial perturbation methods showed good detection rates and BSSs for intense rains. The MSV method showed a rapid growth in the ensemble spread of precipitation up to a forecast time of 6 h, which suggests suitability of the mesoscale SV for short-range EPSs, but the initial large growth of the perturbation did not last long. The performance of the MBD method was good for ensemble prediction of intense rain with a relatively small computing cost. The LET method showed similar characteristics to the MBD method, but the spread and growth rate were slightly smaller and the relative operating characteristic area skill score and BSS did not surpass those of MBD. These characteristic features of the five methods were confirmed by checking the evolution of the total energy norms and their growth rates. Characteristics of the initial perturbations obtained by four methods (GSV, MSV, MBD and LET) were examined for the case of a synoptic low-pressure system passing over eastern China. With GSV and MSV, the regions of large spread were near the low-pressure system, but with MSV, the distribution was more concentrated on the mesoscale disturbance. On the other hand, large-spread areas were observed southwest of the disturbance in MBD and LET. The horizontal pattern of LET perturbation was similar to that of MBD, but the amplitude of the LET perturbation reflected the observation density.
机译:作为世界天气研究计划(WWRP)北京2008年奥运会研究与发展项目(WWRP)中尺度集合预报系统(EPS)比较的一部分,气象研究所(MRI)比较了中尺度集合预报的不同初始扰动方法。 B08RDP)。针对B08RDP开发了五种用于中尺度系综预测的初始扰动方法,并在MRI上进行了比较:(1)日本气象厅(JMA)的一周运行EPS(WEP)的缩减方法;(2)单一的目标全球模型向量(GSV)方法,(3)基于JMA非静水模型(NHM)伴随模型的中尺度模型奇异向量(MSV)方法,(4)基于NHM的中尺度繁殖生长模式(MBD)方法使用NHM预测和(5)基于局部集合变换卡尔曼滤波器(LETKF)的局部集合变换(LET)方法。这些摄动方法被应用到水平分辨率为15 km的B08RDP Tier-1中尺度集合预报的初步实验中。为了使比较容易,对三种基于中尺度模型的初始扰动方法(MSV,MBD和LET)采用了相同的水平分辨率(40 km)。 GSV方法完全优于WEP方法,证实了在中规模EPS中定位的优势。 GSV方法在整体均方根均方根误差,整个36小时预报期内整体展布的大增长率以及弱雨的高检出率和高Brier技能评分(BSS)方面表现良好。另一方面,基于中尺度模型的初始扰动方法对于强降雨显示出良好的检测率和BSS。 MSV方法显示降水的总体传播迅速增长,直至预测时间为6 h,这表明中尺度SV适用于短距离EPS,但最初的大扰动增长并未持续很长时间。 MBD方法的性能很好,可以以较低的计算成本对强降雨进行整体预测。 LET方法显示出与MBD方法相似的特征,但扩展和增长率略小,相对操作特征区域技能得分和BSS均未超过MBD。通过检查总能量范数及其增长率来确认这五种方法的这些特征。研究了通过一种方法(GSV,MSV,MBD和LET)获得的初始扰动的特征,该方法通过了华东地区的天气低压系统。对于GSV和MSV,大范围扩散区域靠近低压系统,而对于MSV,分布更集中于中尺度扰动。另一方面,在MBD和LET的扰动西南部观察到大范围的区域。 LET扰动的水平模式与MBD相似,但是LET扰动的幅度反映了观测密度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tellus》 |2011年第3期|p.445-467|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan;

    Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan;

    Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan;

    Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan;

    Meteorological Research Institute, 1-1 Nagamine, Tsukuba,Ibaraki 305-0052, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:31:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号