首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >'Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0': Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process
【24h】

'Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0': Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process

机译:“零散的威权主义2.0”:中国政策进程中的政治多元化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Traditional analyses of political liberalization in China focus on elections or other facets of democratization. But they cannot account for the fact that although China remains authoritarian, it is nevertheless responsive to the increasingly diverse demands of Chinese society. I argue that the rules of the policy-making process are still captured by the fragmented authoritarianism framework, but that the process has become increasingly pluralized: barriers to entry have been lowered, at least for certain actors (hitherto peripheral officials, non-governmental organizations and the media) identified here as "policy entrepreneurs." With policy change as the variable of interest, I compare three cases of hydropower policy outcomes. I argue that policy entrepreneurs' ability to frame the issue effectively explains variation in hydropower policy outcomes. I then extend these findings to an unlikely policy area, international trade, specifically, the 2001-06 Sino-EU trade talks over child-resistant lighter safety regulations.
机译:中国对政治自由化的传统分析集中在选举或民主化的其他方面。但是他们不能解释这样一个事实,即尽管中国仍然是独裁者,但它仍然对中国社会日益多样化的需求做出了回应。我认为,决策过程的规则仍然被支离破碎的威权主义框架所俘获,但是该过程已变得越来越多元化:进入的壁垒已经降低,至少对于某些行为者(迄今为止的外围官员,非政府组织)和媒体)在这里被称为“政策企业家”。以政策变化为关注变量,我比较了三种水电政策成果案例。我认为政策企业家有能力解决问题,这有效地解释了水电政策成果的变化。然后,我将这些发现扩展到一个不太可能的政策领域,即国际贸易,特别是2001-06年中欧关于防儿童打火机安全法规的贸易谈判。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The China quarterly》 |2009年第200期|995-1012|共18页
  • 作者

    Andrew Mertha;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:43:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号