首页> 外文期刊>The China quarterly >Gauging the Elite Political Equilibrium in the CCP: A Quantitative Approach Using Biographical Data
【24h】

Gauging the Elite Political Equilibrium in the CCP: A Quantitative Approach Using Biographical Data

机译:衡量中国共产党的精英政治平衡:使用传记数据的定量方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Can one man dominate the Chinese Communist Party? This has been a much debated issue in the field of Chinese politics. Using a novel database that tracks the biographies of all Central Committee (CC) members from 1921 to 2007, we derive a measure of top CCP leaders' factional strength in the CC. We show that Mao could not maintain a commanding presence in the Party elite after the Eighth Party Congress in 1956, although the Party chairman enjoyed a prolonged period of consolidated support in the CC at a time when the CCP faced grave external threats. No Chinese leader, not even Mao himself, could regain the level of influence that he had enjoyed in the late 1940s. Our results, however, do not suggest that a "code of civility" has developed among Chinese leaders. The Cultural Revolution saw the destruction of Liu Shaoqi's faction. Although violent purges ended after the Cultural Revolution, Chinese leaders continued to promote followers into the CC and to remove rivals' followers.
机译:一个人可以统治中国共产党吗?在中国政治领域,这是一个备受争议的问题。我们使用一个新颖的数据库来追踪1921年至2007年所有中央委员会成员的传记,以此来衡量中共最高领导人在中央委员会中的派系实力。我们表明,尽管在中共面临严峻的外部威胁之际,党主席在中央委员会享有长期的长期支持,但毛泽东在1956年第八届党代表大会之后仍无法在党的精英中保持统治地位。没有中国领导人,甚至毛泽东本人也无法恢复他在1940年代后期所享有的影响力水平。但是,我们的结果并不表明中国领导人已经制定了“文明守则”。文革期间,刘少奇的派系遭到破坏。尽管在文化大革命后暴力清洗结束了,但中国领导人仍在继续将追随者提升为中共,并清除竞争对手的追随者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号