首页> 外文期刊>The Business Lawyer >Corporate Governance and Countervailing Power
【24h】

Corporate Governance and Countervailing Power

机译:公司治理与反补贴权

获取原文
       

摘要

The analysis of corporate governance has been a one-sided affair. The focus has been on "internal" accountability mechanisms, namely boards and shareholders. Each has become more effective since debates about corporate governance began in earnest in the 1970s but it is doubtful whether this process can continue. Correspondingly, it is an opportune time to expand the analysis of corporate governance. This article does so by focusing on three "external" accountability mechanisms that can operate as significant constraints on managerial discretion, namely governmental regulation of corporate activity, competitive pressure from rival firms, and organized labor. A unifying feature is that each was an element of a theory of "countervailing power" economist John Kenneth Galbraith developed in the 1950s with respect to corporations, an era when external accountability mechanisms did more than their internal counterparts to keep management in check.
机译:公司治理分析一直是一个单方面的事情。重点一直放在“内部”问责机制上,即董事会和股东。自从关于公司治理的辩论在1970年代开始认真讨论以来,每一种方法都变得更加有效,但是,这一过程是否能够持续一直令人怀疑。相应地,现在是扩展公司治理分析的时机。本文通过关注三种“外部”问责机制来做到这一点,这三种机制可能会对管理自由裁量权产生重大限制,即政府对公司活动的监管,竞争对手的竞争压力以及有组织的劳动力。一个统一的特征是,每一个都是“反权力”经济学家约翰·肯尼思·加尔布雷思(John Kenneth Galbraith)在1950年代针对公司发展的理论的一个要素,在这个时代,外部问责机制比内部问责机制做更多的事情来控制管理层。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Business Lawyer》 |2019年第1期|1-52|共52页
  • 作者

    Brian R. Cheffins;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:20:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号