首页> 外文期刊>The Business Lawyer >In Defense of E. Merrick Dodd: Corporate Social Responsibility in Modern Corporate Law and Investment Strategy
【24h】

In Defense of E. Merrick Dodd: Corporate Social Responsibility in Modern Corporate Law and Investment Strategy

机译:捍卫E. Merrick Dodd:现代公司法和投资策略中的公司社会责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This response to E. Merrick Dodd and the Rise and Fall of Corporate Stakeholder Theory by Charles Elson and Nicholas Goossen argues that stakeholder theory has not failed, but rather has been incorporated into standard business practice through the widely accepted principles of corporate social responsibility ("CSR"). Forty years of research demonstrates that CSR contributes or may even be essential to profitability, which may explain why investments in ESG funds have grown dramatically in recent years, even among institutional investors. This response also examines many of the legal and economic theories that Elson and Goossen employ in their attack on stakeholder theory, and argues that they are, at best, debatable.
机译:查尔斯·埃尔森(Charles Elson)和尼古拉斯·古森(Nicholas Goossen)对E.梅里克·多德(E. Merrick Dodd)以及公司利益相关者理论的兴衰的回应认为,利益相关者理论并没有失败,而是通过广泛接受的企业社会责任原则被纳入标准的商业实践中(“ CSR”)。四十年的研究表明,企业社会责任对盈利能力有贡献甚至是必不可少的,这也许可以解释为什么近年来对ESG基金的投资急剧增长,即使在机构投资者中也是如此。此回应还考察了Elson和Goossen在攻击利益相关者理论时采用的许多法律和经济理论,并认为它们充其量是有争议的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Business Lawyer》 |2018年第2期|337-374|共38页
  • 作者

    Michael J. Vargas;

  • 作者单位

    Santa Clara University School of Law, and ABA Business Law Section's Subcommittee on Social Entrepreneurship and Social Benefit Entities;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:37:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号