首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >Clarifying the many confusions that lie behind financial charges
【24h】

Clarifying the many confusions that lie behind financial charges

机译:澄清财务费用背后的许多困惑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We have seen how contractors' claims for loss and expense may appear, on the face of it, to be the worst form of Voodoo; but that, with the application of the talisman of the general principles of the common law, the magic fades to reveal a fairly ordinary, and usually inflated, claim for damages for delay. A loss and expense claim would not be complete without a claim for interest, but just to maintain the confusion, it uses the term 'finance charges'instead. Nevertheless, the idea behind a claim for finance charges is a simple one. If contractors are delayed and have to increase their borrowings to maintain progress, they will bear the cost of additional interest until their claim is resolved and paid. This may not be until agreement of the final account, and if disputed, may not be until a court or arbitrator gives a decision months or years later. What may start out as insignificant costs can, on large projects, amount to huge sums.
机译:从表面上看,我们已经看到承包商的损失和费用索赔可能看起来是伏都教最糟糕的形式;但是随着普通法通则的护身符的应用,魔术消失了,揭示了一种相当普通的,通常是夸大的,要求延误赔偿的索赔。如果没有利息索赔,损失和费用索赔将是不完整的,而只是为了保持混乱,它使用了“财务费用”一词。不过,索要财务费用的想法很简单。如果承包商被拖延而不得不增加借款以保持进度,他们将承担额外的利息,直到他们的索赔得到解决并付清为止。这可能要等到最终决算达成一致之后,如果有争议,就可能要等到法院或仲裁员几个月或几年后才做出决定。在大型项目中,起初可能是微不足道的费用可能是一笔巨款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号