首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >'Design review is very fair-minded'
【24h】

'Design review is very fair-minded'

机译:“设计审查非常有主见”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A very interesting idea. After all, CABE invites local planning authorities to attend design review meetings and to speak. From a practical point of view, it would further add to the design review panel's burden, partly by introducing evening shifts, but also requiring time to assess which projects to speak on, assuming invitations were forthcoming. One for discussion.rnYou could say the same aboutrnIgloo, but that would be unfair. I think it is also unfair about CABE. New organisations doing good work make a disproportionate splash; it is inevitable that repetition of activity makes them seem more routine. In fact, CABE has been quietly influential recentlyrnon minimum school design standards, Olympic design and the government's World Class Places programme. The trouble is that perceptions, even if they are off the mark, are still perceptions.
机译:一个非常有趣的想法。毕竟,CABE邀请地方规划部门参加设计评审会议并发表讲话。从实用的角度来看,这将进一步加重设计评审小组的负担,部分是通过引入夜班制,但也需要时间来评估要发言的项目,前提是即将收到邀请。一个可以讨论。关于冰屋您可以说同样的话,但这不公平。我认为CABE也不公平。做好工作的新组织引起了不相称的轰动。不可避免的是,重复活动会使他们显得更加例行。事实上,CABE一直在悄悄影响着最低学校设计标准,奥林匹克设计和政府的世界一流名额计划。问题在于,即使感觉不合时宜,这些感知仍然是感知。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2009年第7期|8-9|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号