首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >Profession divided on merits of Make's 5 Broadgate design
【24h】

Profession divided on merits of Make's 5 Broadgate design

机译:专业对Make的5 Broadgate设计的优劣进行了划分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reaction has been swift and plentiful to Ken Shuttle worth's defence of his practice's design and criticism of existing buildings Last week's defence by Ken Shuttleworth of his practice Make's controversial 5 Broadgate scheme in the City of London provoked a flurry of responses. ■ Among the more contentious comments made by the Make founder included his thoughts on the 1980s Arup Associates-l designed buildings on the site, which may yet be recommended for listing by English Heritage. He said: 'I'm incredulous some people think No 4 and No 6 Broadgate are worth preserving. They are not wonderful. Even Peter Foggo, the architect who designed them, didn't like them.' See the full interview at www. S architectsjournal.
机译:对于肯·舒特尔值得捍卫他的做法的设计和对现有建筑物的批评,反应迅速而丰富。肯·舒特尔沃思上周对他的作法的辩护在伦敦金融城引起争议的5 Broadgate计划引起了一系列的回应。 ■在Make创始人提出的更具争议的评论中,包括他对1980年代Arup Associates-l设计的网站上的建筑物的想法,但英国遗产可能仍建议将其列出。他说:“我令人难以置信,有人认为4号和6号Broadgate值得保留。他们不是很棒。甚至设计它们的建筑师Peter Foggo也都不喜欢它们。请参阅完整的采访,网址为www。 S Architectsjournal。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2011年第17期|p.8-9|共2页
  • 作者

    Phil Doyle;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:33:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号