首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >Many of us thought Brick By Brick was a great new way to deliver quality housing. Were we wrong?
【24h】

Many of us thought Brick By Brick was a great new way to deliver quality housing. Were we wrong?

机译:我们许多美国以为砖块砖是一种提供优质住房的新方法。 我们错了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The demise of Brick By Brick is not only a misfortune for all those directly concerned and for the citizens of Croydon, it also raises major questions for very many of us across the housing industry. Brick By Brick had a highly respected leadership, employed many talented people, had the backing of a forward-looking council and looked as if it was going to pave the way for a fresh way of creating much-needed housing of high design quality. Yet something went wrong, as it seems to have done on a more modest scale with other housing development companies sponsored by councils. Because so many are looking to this model, it is crucial to gain as clear an understanding as possible as to why it failed.
机译:砖块砖的消亡不仅是直接有关的所有人和克罗伊登公民的不幸,它也会在房屋业对我们中的许多人提出重大问题。 砖块砖拥有备受尊敬的领导,雇用了许多才华横溢的人,有一个前瞻性委员会的支持,看起来好像是为了一种新的方式为创造高设计质量的急需外壳铺平道路。 然而出现了一些问题,因为它似乎已经与理事会赞助的其他住房开发公司更加适中。 因为很多都在寻找这种模型,所以可以清楚地获得尽可能清晰的理解至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The architects' journal》 |2021年第9期|22-23|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号