首页> 外文期刊>Text and Performance Quarterly >Frustrating the a??Ia??: Critical Dialogic Reflexivity with Personal Voice
【24h】

Frustrating the a??Ia??: Critical Dialogic Reflexivity with Personal Voice

机译:令人沮丧的a ?? Ia ??:个人语音的批判性自反性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The essay demonstrates dialogic reflexivity in performance, performative response, and engaging criticism through the analysis of two stories. The first story, set in a bar, recounts a verbal homophobic assault, specifically crafted to examine the workings of masculinity, homophobia, and shame. The second story, a metanarrative of the first story, analyzes the ongoing process of uncovering the critical absences, fallibility, and tragic dimensions to how I have narrated this a??bar story.a?? Using these two stories to ground the discussion, this essay asserts an ethical framework for critically and reflexively dialoguing personal narrative, auto-ethnographic, and autobiographical scholarship. Marking the inherent fallibility of self-accounting and the need for a dialogic reflexive processing of personal accounts, this essay calls for us to move beyond mere critical textualizing strategies of personal narrative to theorize the ethical dimensions of how we audience, engage, and respond to personal claims to experience. Asserting a guiding framework of fallibility and comic musement in processing the a??I,a?? this essay argues that the concepts of a??critical frustrationa?? and a??critical tragedya?? offer productive tools for ethically guiding dialogic engagement with a??one'sa?? claimed experience. Furthermore, conceptions of self-reflexivity and intersectionality are reframed as guiding ethics, ongoing collaborative processes, rather than isolated standards or criteria for evaluating a personal account. The result is an ethical argument for rejecting critical tragedy in favor of a model of critical frustration.View full textDownload full textKeywordsReflexivity, Personal Narrative, Critical Frustration, Ethics, IntersectionalityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2011.602707
机译:这篇文章通过对两个故事的分析,展示了对话在表演,表演回应和参与批评方面的反思性。第一个故事设在酒吧中,讲述了一种口头的恐同性袭击,专门用来检查男性气概,恐同和羞耻的行为。第二个故事是第一个故事的叙事,它分析了发现关键缺失,易失性和悲剧性维度的持续过程,以描述我如何叙述这个“酒吧故事”。本文利用这两个故事为讨论奠定了基础,提出了一个伦理框架,用于批判性地和反身地对话个人叙事,民族志和自传学术。这篇文章指出了自我会计的内在谬误和对个人账户进行对话反思性处理的需要,呼吁我们超越个人叙事的批判性文本化策略,以理论化我们如何听众,参与和回应的道德层面个人要求体验。在处理a ?? I,a ??时确立一个易错性和喜剧感的指导框架。本文认为“关键挫败感”的概念和一个“严重的悲剧”?提供生产性工具,从道德上指导与“一个人”的对话参与声称的经验。此外,自我反省和交叉性的概念被重新定义为指导道德,正在进行的协作过程,而不是孤立的标准或评估个人帐户的标准。结果是在道德悲剧上拒绝道德悲剧的道德支持,而倾向于道德挫败的模型。查看全文下载全文citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2011.602707

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号