...
首页> 外文期刊>Terrorism and Political Violence >a??Destroy Them to Save Usa??: Theories of Genocide and the Logics of Political Violence
【24h】

a??Destroy Them to Save Usa??: Theories of Genocide and the Logics of Political Violence

机译:“摧毁他们以拯救美国”:种族灭绝理论和政治暴力逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Based on an analytic review of recent scholarly advances in genocide studies, this article investigates the causes, concept, and logic of genocide while suggesting a set of theoretical propositions and avenues for future research. Two emerging theoretical streams of literature on causesa??strategic and ideologicala??highlight different dimensions of genocide and should be thought of as compatible. The study of genocide should be embedded in a broader study of political violence; the two literatures have been strangely cloistered from each other. To that end, genocide should be conceptualized as group-selective, large-scale violence whose purpose is group destruction. This stands in contrast to violence that is individually selective or indiscriminate; small-scale and not sustained across time and space; and whose purpose is repression, communication, or some other outcome short of group destruction. To develop existing theory and to bring the study of genocide closer to the literature on violence, studying variation in outcomes is essential; that is, students of genocide should ask why genocide and not another outcome occurs, rather than only studying common patterns among genocide cases. Similarly, rather than study primarily sources of escalation and accelerators of violence, scholars should also theorize restraint and decelerators of violence. Further, scholars of genocide should focus attention on the interaction between national and sub-national actors as well as periods of escalation or de-escalation. In these ways and others proposed in the essay, genocide studies can build on recent gains and develop a broader and more coherent field of theoretical inquiry.View full textDownload full textKeywordsconflict processes, constraint, genocide, ideology, local actors, mass killing, negative cases, periodization, political violenceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2012.700611
机译:在对种族灭绝研究的最新研究进展进行分析性回顾的基础上,本文研究了种族灭绝的原因,概念和逻辑,同时为今后的研究提出了一系列理论主张和途径。关于原因,战略和意识形态的两个新兴的理论文献流突显了种族灭绝的不同方面,应该认为是相容的。种族灭绝的研究应纳入对政治暴力的更广泛研究中;两种文献彼此奇怪地相互隔离。为此,应将种族灭绝概念化为针对群体的大规模暴力,其目的是破坏群体。这与个别选择或不加选择的暴力形成鲜明对比;规模小,无法跨时空维持;并且其目的是压制,沟通或其他一些破坏小组的结果。为了发展现有的理论并使种族灭绝的研究更接近关于暴力的文献,研究结果的差异是必不可少的;也就是说,种族灭绝的学生应该问为什么种族灭绝而不是其他后果发生,而不是仅仅研究种族灭绝案件中的共同模式。同样,学者们不仅应该研究暴力升级和暴力加速的根源,还应该从理论上限制和减少暴力。此外,种族灭绝的学者应集中注意国家行为者与次国家行为者之间的相互作用以及升级或降级的时期。通过这些方法以及本文中提出的其他方法,种族灭绝研究可以在最近的研究成果的基础上发展,并发展出一个更广泛,更连贯的理论探究领域。 ,分期,政治暴力相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2012.700611

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号