...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Reports >States' Ability to Change Separations Factors Dominates Oral Argument Over Freeze Extension
【24h】

States' Ability to Change Separations Factors Dominates Oral Argument Over Freeze Extension

机译:各州改变分离因素的能力在冻结延期的口头辩论中占主导地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A federal appellate judge focused during a Jan. 17 oral argument over the FCC's 2018 separations freeze extension order on the questions of whether states were free to adjust separations factors for intrastate purposes and whether the FCC has been sufficiently clear that they may do so. During oral argument in The lrregulators et al. v. FCC and United States of America (case 19-1085) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, W. Scott McCullough, the attorney for parties challenging the order, told Senior Circuit Judge Stephen H. Williams that the petitioners would be happy to take a loss on the merits if they could walk away with a clear statement from the FCC that states were not precluded from adjusting separations factors for purposes such as intrastate universal service support.
机译:联邦上诉法院法官在1月17日针对FCC 2018年分居冻结延期令的口头辩论中集中讨论了以下问题:各州是否可以出于州内目的自由调整分居因素,以及FCC是否足够明确地表示可以这样做。在The lrregulators等人的口头辩论中。美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院诉FCC和美利坚合众国(案例19-1085),质疑该命令的当事方律师W. Scott McCullough告诉高级巡回法院法官Stephen H. Williams,如果请愿人能够接受美国联邦通信委员会的明确声明,即不排除各州出于诸如州内普遍服务支持之类的目的而调整离职系数的意愿,那么他们将乐于蒙受损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号