...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunication Journal of Australia >THE AUSTRALIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS REGIME – TEN YEARS ON
【24h】

THE AUSTRALIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS REGIME – TEN YEARS ON

机译:澳大利亚电信访问系统-十年来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When open competition was introduced through the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth), Part XIB – ThenTelecommunications Industry: Anti-Competitive Conduct and Record-Keeping rules and Part XIC – Telecom-nmunications Access Regime were added to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) to underpin open competition.nIn moving from the former Government owned monopoly providers to open competition, new competitorsnto the former monopolist Telecom (now Telstra) had to be able to interconnect to Telstra’s infrastructurento be able to provide competing services. The Government’s aim was that, in the first instance, intercon-nnection arrangements would be commercially negotiated. Failing successful negotiations, however, thenAccess Regime provided that the bottleneck facilities could be ‘declared’. Once a service is ‘declared’, thenprovider of the declared service has specific obligations to provide interconnection on specified terms,nwith the possibility that the ACCC can arbitrate disputes on access to ‘declared’ services. Ten years later,nthe effectiveness of the Access Regime is being questioned, by the competition regulator, by Telstra andnby Telstra’s competitors.
机译:当通过《 1997年电信法》(联邦)引入公开竞争时,《 1974年贸易实践法》(联邦)增加了第XIB部分–《电信行业:反竞争行为和记录保存规则》和第XIC部分–《电信通讯访问制度》,在从前政府拥有的垄断提供者转向公开竞争的过程中,新的竞争者必须过渡到前垄断者电信(现为Telstra)才能与Telstra的基础设施互连,才能提供竞争性服务。政府的目标是,首先,互连互通安排应通过商业谈判达成。但是,如果谈判没有成功,则Access Regime规定可以“声明”瓶颈设施。 “宣布”服务后,声明服务的提供者将有特定义务按指定条款提供互连,而ACCC可能会就使用“宣布”服务的争议进行仲裁。十年后,竞争监管机构,Telstra和nbyTelstra的竞争对手都质疑访问机制的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号