...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >Net Neutrality Rules to Be Decided After November Elections
【24h】

Net Neutrality Rules to Be Decided After November Elections

机译:十一月选举后将决定净中立规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The FCC Wireline and Wireless bureaus sought more comment in the net neutrality proceeding Wednesday. Comments are due 55 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register, replies 25 days later. That effectively kicks key decisions on that and broadband reclassification back until after the November elections, said many agency and industry officials. Odds had already appeared slim that Chairman Julius Genachowski would circulate an order on his proposed "third way" reclassification plan Thursday, for a vote at the Sept. 23 open meeting. The new public notice poses questions on what have emerged, according to most observers, as the most contentious issues in negotiations over a net neutrality agreement: Managed services and unique problems faced by wireless providers. There appear to be "three general areas of concern" to "maintain the investment promoting benefits" of what the notice called "specialized" services "while protecting the Internet's openness." One concern is that net neutrality rules could be less effective if providers "offer specialized services that are substantially similar to, but do not technically meet the definition of, broadband Internet access service." nn nnA second concern is that carriers would neglect the buildout of the rest of their networks to add to their capacity to offer managed services. "If this occurs, and particularly if one or more specialized services serve as substitutes for the delivery of content, applications, and services over broadband Internet access service, the open Internet may wither as an open platform for competition, innovation, and free expression." A third concern is that providers would be able to engage in "anti-competitive conduct with respect to specialized services," especially those that offer content, applications, or services "or if they enter into business arrangements with third-party content, application, or service providers concerning specialized service offerings." Commissioner Robert McDowell, an opponent of reclassification and of the FCC’s net neutrality proposal, questioned whether asking additional questions will be helpful. "Thus far, the record has revealed nothing that requires intervention by the government," he said. "The Internet has been open since its inception and is the greatest deregulatory success story of all time. While I do not object to an opportunity for further public comment, I doubt any new factual revelations will come to light that would justify Internet regulation."
机译:FCC有线和无线局希望在星期三进行的网络中立性方面获得更多评论。通知应在联邦公报上发布通知后的55天后发表,并在25天后答复。许多机构和行业官员说,这有效地推动了关键决策,宽带重新分类要追溯到11月的选举之后。主席朱利叶斯•根纳科夫斯基(Julius Genachowski)主席将在周四发布其拟议的“第三条路线”改叙计划的命令,这一可能性似乎已经渺茫了,并于9月23日举行了公开会议。多数观察家认为,新的公开公告对出现的问题提出了质疑,这些问题是网络中立协议谈判中最有争议的问题:托管服务和无线提供商所面临的独特问题。似乎有“三个值得关注的普遍领域”,以“保持投资促进利益”,即所谓的“专业化”服务,“同时保护互联网的开放性”。一个担忧是,如果提供商“提供与宽带互联网接入服务实质上相似但在技术上不符合宽带服务定义的专业服务,则网络中立性规则的效力可能会降低。” nn nn第二个问题是运营商会忽略其余网络的扩展,以增加其提供托管服务的能力。 “如果发生这种情况,特别是如果一项或多项专门服务替代了通过宽带Internet访问服务交付内容,应用程序和服务,则开放Internet可能会成为竞争,创新和自由表达的开放平台。 ”第三个问题是,提供者将能够“就专门服务进行反竞争行为”,特别是那些提供内容,应用程序或服务的人,或者如果他们与第三方内容,应用程序,或与专门服务产品有关的服务提供商。”反对重新分类和FCC的网络中立提案的专员罗伯特·麦克道威尔(Robert McDowell)质疑,提出其他问题是否有帮助。他说:“到目前为止,记录还没有显示出需要政府干预的任何内容。” “互联网自开放以来一直是开放的,并且是有史以来最大的放松管制的成功故事。尽管我不反对有机会进一步发表公众评论,但我怀疑会揭露任何足以证明对互联网进行监管的新事实。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2010年第170期| p.1-1| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号