...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Disability >Quality of evidence of assistive technology interventions for people with disability: An overview of systematic reviews
【24h】

Quality of evidence of assistive technology interventions for people with disability: An overview of systematic reviews

机译:残疾人辅助技术干预的证据质量:系统评价的概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This overview summarizes the available evidence from systematic reviews of outcomes studies on various assistiventechnologies (AT) for persons with disabilities. Systematic reviews published between January 2000 and April 2010 werenidentified by comprehensive literature searches. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality evaluation were donenby two authors independently. The quality of evidence was summarized by explicit methods. Types of disabilities, settings, andnAT interventions were recorded. Outcomes were mapped according to the Taxonomy of Assistive Technology Device Outcomes.nForty-four systematic reviews were included in this overview. High-quality evidence was found in single AT (positive effectsnof providing AT in connection with home assessment and hearing aids, no effects of hip protectors) for limited populationsn(older people at home, people with hearing loss, and older people in institutional care, respectively). Low-quality or unclearnevidence was found for the effectiveness of the other evaluated AT interventions. Current gaps in AT outcomes research werenidentified. Many frequently used devices have not been systematically reviewed. Well-designed outcomes research to informnclinical decision-making is urgently needed. The systematic review methodology seems to be feasible for summarising ATnoutcomes research, but methodological development for grading and for primary studies is warranted
机译:本概述概述了对残疾人各种辅助技术(AT)进行的结局研究的系统评价得出的可用证据。 2000年1月至2010年4月之间发表的系统评价被综合文献检索所识别。两位作者分别完成了研究选择,数据提取和方法学质量评估。证据的质量通过显式方法进行了总结。记录残疾类型,环境和nAT干预措施。根据辅助技术设备结果分类法对结果进行了映射。此概述中包括四十四次系统评价。在少数人群(家庭中的老年人,听力受损的人以及老年人,机构护理)中,单个AT(在与家庭评估和助听器相关的AT中提供了AT的积极效果,对髋部保护器没有影响)中发现了高质量的证据,分别)。发现其他评估的AT干预措施的有效性低劣或不清楚。目前尚无法确定AT结果研究中的差距。许多经常使用的设备尚未得到系统的审查。迫切需要设计合理的结果研究以进行临床决策。对于ATnoutcomes研究的总结,系统的审查方法似乎是可行的,但是分级和基础研究的方法学发展是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号