首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >The Puzzle of Nazi Modernism: Modern Technology and Ideological Consensus in an SS Factory at Auschwitz
【24h】

The Puzzle of Nazi Modernism: Modern Technology and Ideological Consensus in an SS Factory at Auschwitz

机译:纳粹现代主义之谜:奥斯威辛集中营一家SS工厂中的现代技术和意识形态共识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

References to Nazi "factories of death" are so common that they verge on cliche. Yet, remarkably, historians of the Third Reich have seldom confronted the role of technology or modern production organization in the Nazi genocide. In general, we have too casually linked Germany's reputation for world-class engineering and efficiency to the Holocaust without bothering to discuss or understand the nature of modern bureaucratic organization or the technology policy directly promoted by those Nazis who managed the mass extermination of human beings. The urge to judge this "dark side" of Western material culture is laudable. Unfortunately, for the moment we lack the historical knowledge needed to speak with credibility and precision. The only notable work to address the engineering profession was written twenty years ago: Karl-Heinz Ludwig's Technik und Ingenieure im Dritten Reich, an excellent beginning that few have followed.
机译:对纳粹“死亡工厂”的提法如此普遍,以至于他们趋于陈词滥调。然而,值得注意的是,第三帝国的历史学家很少在纳粹大屠杀中面对技术或现代生产组织的作用。总体而言,我们过于随意地将德国在世界级工程和效率上的声誉与大屠杀联系在一起,而不必费神去讨论或理解现代官僚组织的性质或由那些管理人类大规模灭绝的纳粹分子直接提倡的技术政策。评判西方物质文化“阴暗面”的冲动值得称赞。不幸的是,目前我们缺乏以可信度和精确度说话所需的历史知识。解决工程专业问题的唯一著名著作是二十年前写的:卡尔·海因茨·路德维希(Karl-Heinz Ludwig)的《德赖顿帝国的技术与工程学》,这是一个极好的开端。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |1996年第3期|p.527-571|共45页
  • 作者

    MICHAEL ALLEN;

  • 作者单位

    Department of History, Technology and Society at the Georgia Institute of Technology;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业技术现状与发展;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:08:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号