首页> 外文期刊>Technology and Culture >A New Perspective on the Natural Philosophy of Steams and Its Relation to the Steam Engine
【24h】

A New Perspective on the Natural Philosophy of Steams and Its Relation to the Steam Engine

机译:一种新的蒸汽自然哲学的透视及其与蒸汽发动机的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Historians' understanding of the steam engine's evolution suffers from back-projections of nineteenth-century physical science, notably thermodynamics, onto the eighteenth century. The idea of steam as a "working substance" to merely transfer heat is anachronistic in the eighteenth-century context. It has led to serious misconceptions. To correct this misreading, this article uncovers three major areas discussing steam in the eighteenth century: producing a vacuum for fire engines and fire pumps; examining experimentally the bulk properties of steam; and the "chemistry of steams" that included studying effluvia and miasmas and that considered steam responsible for earthquakes, winds, storms, and other natural phenomena. In the eighteenth century, more natural philosophizing about steam (and other matters) was done in and across practical settings in the large than historians have realized. Subsequent understandings and later divisions of knowledge and practice have obscured much.
机译:历史学家对蒸汽机的发展的理解患有十九世纪的物理科学的背投,特别是热力学,在十八世纪。蒸汽作为“工作物质”以仅仅转移热量的蒸汽的想法在十八世纪的背景下是不间断的。它导致了严重的误解。为了纠正这种误读,本文揭示了第十八世纪讨论蒸汽的三个主要领域:为消防车和消防泵生产真空。通过实验检查蒸汽的散装性质;和“蒸汽化学”包括研究效果和摩西马斯,并认为蒸汽负责地震,风,风暴和其他自然现象。在十八世纪,关于蒸汽(和其他事项)的更自然的哲学在大于历史学家的实际设置中完成了。随后的理解和后来的知识和实践分裂掩盖了很多。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology and Culture》 |2020年第4期|1129-1148|共20页
  • 作者

    Miller David Philip;

  • 作者单位

    Univ New South Wales Hist Sci Sydney NSW Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号