首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Society-nature-technology (SNT) nexus: Institutional causes and cures of national morbidities
【24h】

Society-nature-technology (SNT) nexus: Institutional causes and cures of national morbidities

机译:社会自然技术(SNT)的联系:国家原因和疾病的根治方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article explores a nexus between society, nature and technology (SNT) in the context of a biomedical problem-solution through innovation project for a new product development in the biopharmaceutical sector. The nexus implies that social intervention is an antecedent to and consequence of nature as a type of morbidity. The central proposition is that national morbidities are partially resulting of national institutions such as policy and culture, and the national institutions partially constitute the response to through industrialisation processes and cultural habits. Based on the data from China and India as two comparable socio-culture contexts, we draw on six types of national morbidities: diabetes, infections, cancer, hepatitis, respiratory dysfunction and hypertension. An analysis shows that diabetes and infectious diseases projects exist more in India; cancer, hepatitis and hypertension projects exist more in China; and contrary to prediction, respiratory dysfunction project appears more in India than China. There are some statistical differences between the North and South regions. The discussion explains the SNT nexus in a broader context suggests two types of interventions: preventive and curing. The preventive intervention comes before nature (morbidity), and the curing intervention occurs after the formation of morbidity. We suggest that preventive institutional intervention for education can be more effective than curing intervention. The prevention mechanism induces awareness; the curing mechanism induces treatment solutions. Our argument supports the social development as much as industrialisation, and not pure industrialisation alone.
机译:本文探讨了通过创新项目解决生物医学问题的社会,自然与技术(SNT)之间的联系,该创新项目用于生物制药领域的新产品开发。关系表明,社会干预是自然作为一种发病率的先决条件和结果。中心命题是,国家发病率部分是由国家机构(例如政策和文化)造成的,而国家机构则部分是通过工业化进程和文化习惯来应对的。根据来自中国和印度的两种可比较的社会文化背景数据,我们得出了六种国家发病率:糖尿病,感染,癌症,肝炎,呼吸功能障碍和高血压。分析表明,印度的糖尿病和传染病项目更多。在中国,存在更多的癌症,肝炎和高血压项目;与预测相反,印度出现的呼吸功能障碍项目比中国多。北部和南部地区之间存在一些统计差异。讨论在更广泛的范围内解释了SNT关系建议了两种干预措施:预防和治愈。预防干预要先于自然发生(发病),而治愈干预要先于发病形成。我们建议,预防性的教育机构干预可能比治疗干预更有效。预防机制可引起意识;固化机理可引出处理溶液。我们的论点不仅支持工业化,还支持社会发展,而不仅仅是单纯的工业化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号