首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Baltic herring for food: Shades of grey in how backcasting recommendations work across exploratory scenarios
【24h】

Baltic herring for food: Shades of grey in how backcasting recommendations work across exploratory scenarios

机译:波罗的海鲱鱼:在探索性方案中回播建议如何工作的灰色阴影

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scenario methods can be used to cope with future uncertainties by envisioning plausible futures and identifying paths to reach desirable targets. The objective of this paper is to develop novel proposals revealing generalised dynamics on "HOW" the different normative recommendations can work under different exploratory scenarios. Previous literature has focused more on developing methods for integrating normative and exploratory scenarios than on theorising dynamics of the HOW question. We examine this theoretical question via a case study on potential futures of use and governance of Baltic herring catch. The case study: 1) develops recommendations on how the use of Baltic herring as food can be increased based on a participatory backcasting workshop with fisheries experts; 2) identifies four exploratory scenarios on the future of Baltic fisheries governance based on a literature review; 3) assesses how the recommendations work under four alternative plausible futures. We identify and discuss six generalised dynamics answering the HOW question. Together, these stress the need to analyse simultaneously multiple drivers, stakeholders, exploratory scenarios, normative recommendations, and synergies and frictions between recommendations. This work contributes to capacities to cope with future changes and proactively develop practical means to make our world more sustainable.
机译:通过设想可能的期货并确定达到理想目标的途径,可以使用情景方法来应对未来的不确定性。本文的目的是提出新颖的建议,以揭示“ HOW”的一般动态,不同的规范性建议可以在不同的探索性场景下工作。以前的文献更多地关注于开发用于整合规范性情景和探索性情景的方法,而不是针对HOW问题的动力学原理。我们通过对波罗的海鲱鱼捕捞的使用和治理的潜在未来进行案例研究来研究这个理论问题。案例研究:1)在与渔业专家进行的参与式cast守研讨会的基础上,提出了关于如何增加波罗的海鲱作为食品使用的建议; 2)根据文献综述确定关于波罗的海渔业管理未来的四种探索性方案; 3)评估建议在四种可能的未来情况下如何运作。我们确定并讨论了六种概括动力学,以回答HOW问题。这些共同强调了需要同时分析多个驱动因素,利益相关者,探索性方案,规范性建议以及建议之间的协同作用和摩擦。这项工作增强了应对未来变化的能力,并积极开发实用手段使我们的世界更加可持续。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technological forecasting and social change》 |2019年第2期|200-209|共10页
  • 作者

    Sarkki Simo; Pihlajamaki Mia;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Oulu, Cultural Anthropol, Fac Humanities, Oulu 90014, Finland;

    Univ Tampere, Fac Management, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland|Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Ecosyst & Environm Res Programme, POB 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland|Univ Oulu, Water Resources & Environm Engn Res Grp, POB 4300, Oulu 90014, Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号