...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >Energy policy planning near grid parity using a price-driven technology penetration model
【24h】

Energy policy planning near grid parity using a price-driven technology penetration model

机译:使用价格驱动的技术渗透模型,在电网平价附近制定能源政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Here we analyze the importance of the price differences between energy technologies for their market penetration. A price-conditioned technology diffusion model was shown to adequately describe the market take-up of solar and wind penetration and natural gas (shale gas) with respect to the (subsidized) price. Because of the simplifications made to the energy system and the economic framework the results are indicative only and limited to less complicated policy cases. The model was used to investigate the effects of public support on the market shares of renewable electricity technologies. The results indicate that a dynamic support structure for new energy technologies may be necessary as their market share increases. At market entry "oversubsidizing" may be necessary, but, when the share grows beyond a certain percentage, cutting down on subsidies will be necessary to avoid the overheating of the market, which could otherwise lead to exponential growth and a huge need for financial support. If the aim is a swift transition to sustainable energy, a price ratio of around 1:3 (new:old) or higher may be necessary in industrialized countries, but in emerging economies, a lower ratio of 1:2 could apply. When the new technology passes the grid parity landmark by 30%, the natural (non-subsidized) penetration rate could settle at 1% of the total market per year, but with more ambitious policy goals some support may be necessary even then. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在这里,我们分析了能源技术之间的价格差异对其市场渗透的重要性。价格约束的技术扩散模型显示出可以充分描述相对于(补贴)价格的太阳能和风能渗透率以及天然气(页岩气)的市场占有率。由于简化了能源系统和经济框架,结果仅是指示性的,并且仅限于不太复杂的政策案例。该模型用于调查公共支持对可再生电力技术市场份额的影响。结果表明,随着新能源技术市场份额的增加,可能需要动态支持结构。在进入市场时,可能有必要“过度补贴”,但是,当份额增长超过一定百分比时,有必要削减补贴以避免市场过热,否则可能导致指数级增长和对资金支持的巨大需求。如果目标是迅速过渡到可持续能源,则在工业化国家中可能需要大约1:3(新的:旧的)价格比,但在新兴经济体中,可以采用更低的1:2的价格比。当新技术通过电网均价标志性指标达到30%时,自然(非补贴)渗透率可能会稳定在每年总市场的1%,但是如果制定更雄心勃勃的政策目标,那么即使到那时,仍可能需要一些支持。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号