...
首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >'Forced technology transfer' policies: Workings in China and strategic implications
【24h】

'Forced technology transfer' policies: Workings in China and strategic implications

机译:“强制技术转让”政策:在中国的运作及其战略意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper evaluates the ability of "forced technology transfer" (FTT) policies - i.e., policies meant to increase foreign-domestic technology transfer that simultaneously weaken appropriability of foreign innovations - to contribute to technology transfer. We focus on transfer of frontier technology in China's newly designated "strategic emerging industries" (SEIs). Drawing on a survey of foreign firms, extensive interviews with foreign firms, and case studies of Chinese firms, we identify three categories of FTT policies in SEIs: "lose the market", "no choice", and "violate the law" policies. Our thematic analysis finds that FTT policies likely exert the most leverage over (i.e., force) frontier technology transfer when accompanied by seven conditions: (1) strong state support for industrial growth, (2) oligopoly competition, (3) other policies closely complementing FTT policies, (4) high technological uncertainty, (5) policy mode of operation offering basic appropriability and tailored to industrial structure, (6) reform avoidance by the state, and (7) stringent policy compliance mechanisms. We develop a Strategy & Risk Matrix to forecast the overall leverage of individual FTT policies. We conclude that Chinese FTT policies may enable domestic acquisition of frontier foreign technology if all seven conditions determining policy leverage are fully exploited by the state. However, if this is not the case, the policies have weaker leverage and may even discourage technology transfer.
机译:本文评估了“强制技术转让”(FTT)政策(即旨在增加外国国内技术转让同时削弱外国创新能力的政策)促进技术转让的能力。我们专注于在中国新指定的“战略新兴产业”(SEIs)中转移前沿技术。通过对外国公司的调查,对外国公司的广泛采访以及对中国公司的案例研究,我们确定了SEI中的FTT政策的三类:“失去市场”,“无选择”和“违反法律”政策。我们的主题分析发现,FTT政策在以下七个条件的陪同下,可能对边境技术转让发挥最大的杠杆作用:(1)国家对工业增长的强有力支持;(2)寡头竞争;(3)其他政策的紧密补充FTT政策;(4)高技术不确定性;(5)提供基本适用性并适合产业结构的政策运作模式;(6)国家避免改革,以及(7)严格的政策合规机制。我们制定了战略和风险矩阵,以预测个别FTT政策的整体杠杆作用。我们得出的结论是,如果国家充分利用了决定政策杠杆作用的所有七个条件,那么中国的FTT政策可能使国内能够获取前沿的外国技术。但是,如果不是这种情况,则策略的杠杆作用会减弱,甚至可能会阻止技术转让。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号