首页> 外文期刊>Technical communication quarterly >Virtual Peer Review: Teaching And Learning About Writing In Online Environments
【24h】

Virtual Peer Review: Teaching And Learning About Writing In Online Environments

机译:虚拟同行评审:在线环境写作方面的教与学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The process approach to writing, which includes multiple drafts and peer review, is pretty well established in composition and technical communication pedagogy. Yet we tend to take the peer review part of the process largely for granted. It is a black box of sorts; not many people have published papers that reflect upon the process, and a fairly standard repertoire of classroom techniques support it. In face-to-face classes, for example, we tend to ask students to exchange paper drafts, and then answer specific questions designed to help the author improve on the draft, based on rhetorical principles of audience, purpose, and situation. Students often protest that peer review is a waste of time, and teachers also disagree on its value (DiPardo & Freedman, 1987). Yet it is a rare writing teacher who has never used peer review. If it accomplishes nothing else,peer review at least affords students another audience besides the teacher; in addition, it relieves teachers of providing the totality of responses to each student's work and affords a second opinion or support when the writer resists a reader's comments.
机译:在写作和技术交流教学法中已经很好地确立了包括多个草稿和同行评审在内的写作过程方法。但是,我们倾向于将同行评审作为流程的一部分,这是理所当然的。这是各种各样的黑匣子。很少有人发表过反映该过程的论文,并且相当标准的课堂技术支持了这一过程。例如,在面对面的课堂上,我们倾向于要求学生交换纸质草稿,然后根据听众,目的和情况的修辞原则回答旨在帮助作者改进草稿的特定问题。学生们常常抗议同行评议是浪费时间,而教师也不同意它的价值(DiPardo&Freedman,1987)。然而,这是一位罕见的写作老师,从未使用过同行评审。如果没有其他成就,同行评议至少可以为学生提供除了老师之外的其他受众;此外,它还减轻了教师提供对每个学生作品的整体回应的负担,并在作者拒绝读者的评论时提供了第二种意见或支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号