首页> 外文期刊>Teaching Education >(Re)considering normal: queering social norms for parents and teachers
【24h】

(Re)considering normal: queering social norms for parents and teachers

机译:(重新)考虑正常:质疑父母和老师的社会规范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent debates regarding same-sex marriage and gay and lesbian adoption highlight the role of schools as sociopolitical institutions. Accordingly, teachers operating within social norms have considerable influence through their interactions with students and their families. Previous research points to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) parents' frustrations with their children's schools, particularly as teachers resist representing LGBT families within curricula and fail to intervene when homophobic comments are made. Yet teachers' capacity to embrace diverse family structures while adhering to cultural expectations for teachers remains unexplored. This study, rooted in queer theory, explores the social norms teachers name for parenting in school settings and the way teachers position LGBT parents within these norms. Findings point to social norms for teachers and parents which indicate that teachers operate within heteronormative frameworks. They consider heterosexuality to be normal, while positioning LGBT identities as deviant. This is troubling given documented connections between teacher attitudes and parental involvement and between parental involvement and student achievement. Unchecked, heteronormative practices may result in inequitable school experiences for LGBT parents and their children. Teacher education must minimize heteronormativity through equipping teachers to attend to their own notions and assumptions regarding the intersection of parenting and sexual orientation.
机译:最近有关同性婚姻和男女同性恋收养的辩论强调了学校作为社会政治机构的作用。因此,在社会规范内运作的教师通过与学生及其家人的互动而具有相当大的影响力。先前的研究指出,女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋和变性者(LGBT)的父母对孩子的学校感到沮丧,特别是因为教师拒绝在课程中代表LGBT家庭,并且在发表同性恋恐惧症评论时未能干预。然而,教师在坚持多种多样的家庭结构的同时,还坚持对教师的文化期望的能力仍未得到开发。这项研究植根于酷儿理论,探讨了在学校环境中为人父母的社会规范教师的名字,以及教师在这些规​​范中将LGBT父母定位的方式。调查结果指出了教师和家长的社会规范,这表明教师在不同规范的框架内运作。他们认为异性恋是正常现象,同时将LGBT身份定位为异常。考虑到老师的态度与父母的参与以及父母的参与与学生成绩之间的联系,这令人不安。未经检查的异性规范做法可能导致LGBT父母及其子女的学校经历不公平。教师教育必须通过让教师注意自己关于养育和性取向交集的观念和假设,来最大程度地减少异性行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号