【24h】

Letters

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Your recent article "Spray Foam: What Do You Really Know" (FHB #204 and online at FineHome building.com) touched on an important topic that seems to be rarely covered: the diminishing return that comes from increasing the thickness of spray-foam insulation. What could have been a great opportunity to discuss how to rationally decide how much insulation is "enough" was presented simplistically, as a matter of two people's opinions.rnWe are told that Chris Porter, the building-science and code manager for BioBased Insulation, says that 6 in. of open- or closed-cell foam "is perfectly adequate" in most parts of the country. Builder Michael Chandler, on the other hand, says that he's OK with "$3000 for the additional 2% in performance." Both of these statements are overly simplistic.
机译:您最近的文章“喷涂泡沫:您真正了解什么”(FHB#204,并且在FineHome building.com上在线)涉及到一个似乎很少涉及的重要主题:增加喷涂泡沫的厚度会带来收益递减绝缘。出于两个人的观点,简单地介绍了如何合理地确定多少隔热材料“足够”是一个很好的机会。有人告诉我们,生物基隔热材料的建筑科学和代码经理克里斯·波特(Chris Porter),他说,在美国大部分地区,6英寸的开孔或闭孔泡沫“绝对足够”。另一方面,建筑商迈克尔·钱德勒(Michael Chandler)则表示“可以接受$ 3000的额外2%性能”。这两个陈述都过于简单。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fine Homebuilding》 |2009年第205期|101214|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号