首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments >Assessment of long-term low emission power generation in Sri Lanka and Thailand
【24h】

Assessment of long-term low emission power generation in Sri Lanka and Thailand

机译:斯里兰卡和泰国的长期低排放发电评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The environmental aspects related to the energy sector are of importance in the emission-constrained world of present times. The objective of this study to assess the effects of Low Carbon Society (LCS) on the Thai and Sri Lankan power systems, in terms of CO_2 mitigation, and energy security and other techno-economic results, such as marginal abatement costs. This study models the power sectors using a bottom-up optimization model called AIM/Enduse. The crux of the analyses is carried out using scenarios. Along with the LCS scenario, this study also considers a LCS scenario without the availability of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), and has two separate scenarios with emission taxes of 50 USD/t-CO_2 and 100 USD/t-CO_2 on the power generation. Results show that there is a cumulative mitigation of 1.4 Gt-CO_2 in the LCS scenario during 2010-2050, when compared to the BAU case for Thailand. Also, the effectiveness of the LCS scenario without CCS, known as the LCS/CCS scenario, is considerably reduced in the Thai power sector. The LCS scenario also has higher energy security, and better economic benefits. The LCS scenario in the Sri Lankan (SL) power sector has a cumulative mitigation of 166 Mt-CO_2. The reduction in effectiveness of the LCS/CCS scenario in SL is not as drastic as the Thai power sector. The need of CCS for Sri Lanka is much reduced. The Marginal Abatement Costs (MAC) show that CCS technology plays a vital part in the Thai power sector and helps reduce the average abatement cost. This holds true in the case of the Sri Lankan power sector as well, yet not to the extent of the Thai case.
机译:在当今排放受限的世界中,与能源部门相关的环境问题至关重要。这项研究的目的是评估低碳协会(LCS)对泰国和斯里兰卡电力系统的影响,以减少CO_2和能源安全以及其他技术经济成果(例如边际减排成本)为依据。本研究使用称为AIM / Enduse的自底向上优化模型对电力部门进行建模。分析的关键是使用场景来进行的。除LCS方案外,本研究还考虑了没有碳捕集与封存(CCS)的LCS方案,并有两种单独的方案,分别对电力征收50美元/吨CO_2和100美元/吨CO_2的排放税。代。结果表明,与泰国的BAU案例相比,LCS情景在2010-2050年期间累计减少了1.4 Gt-CO_2。另外,泰国电力部门大大降低了不采用CCS的LCS方案(称为LCS / CCS方案)的有效性。 LCS方案还具有更高的能源安全性和更好的经济效益。斯里兰卡(SL)电力部门的LCS方案累计缓解了166 Mt-CO_2。 SL中LCS / CCS方案的有效性下降不像泰国电力部门那样剧烈。 CCS对斯里兰卡的需求已大大减少。边际减排成本(MAC)表明CCS技术在泰国电力行业中起着至关重要的作用,并有助于降低平均减排成本。斯里兰卡的电力部门也是如此,但不限于泰国。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号