首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: finding the common ground of multi-faceted concepts
【24h】

Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: finding the common ground of multi-faceted concepts

机译:跨学科和跨学科研究:寻找多方面概念的共同点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Inter- and transdisciplinarity are increasingly relevant concepts and research practices within academia. Although there is a consensus about the need to apply these practices, there is no agreement over definitions. Building on the outcomes of the first year of the COST Action TD1408 Interdisciplinarity in research programming and funding cycles (INTREPID), this paper describes the similarities and differences between interpretations of inter- and transdisciplinarity. Drawing on literature review and empirical results from participatory workshops involving INTREPID Network members from 27 different countries, the paper shows that diverse definitions of inter-and transdisciplinarity coexist within scientific literature and are reproduced by researchers and practitioners within the network. The recognition of this diversity did not hinder the definition of basic requirements for inter- and transdisciplinarity. We present five basic units considered as building blocks for this type of research. These building blocks are: (1) creation of collective glossaries, (2) definition of boundary objects, (3) use of combined problem- and solution-oriented approaches, (4) inclusion of a facilitator of inter-and transdisciplinary research within the team and (5) promotion of reflexivity by accompanying research. These were considered five basic units for effective inter- and transdisciplinary research although the 4th building block was also considered as matrix that holds all the others together.
机译:跨学科和跨学科是学术界越来越重要的概念和研究实践。尽管对于应用这些做法的必要性达成了共识,但对定义并没有达成共识。基于COST行动TD1408跨学科研究计划和资助周期(INTREPID)的第一年成果,本文描述了跨学科和跨学科解释之间的异同。利用来自27个不同国家的INTREPID网络成员的参与性研讨会的文献综述和经验结果,论文显示,跨学科和跨学科的定义在科学文献中共存,并且由网络中的研究人员和从业人员复制。对这种多样性的认识并没有妨碍对跨学科和跨学科的基本要求的定义。我们提出了五个基本单元,它们被认为是此类研究的基础。这些基础是:(1)创建集体词汇表,(2)边界对象的定义,(3)使用面向问题和解决方案的组合方法,(4)在跨学科研究中纳入促进者(5)通过伴随研究促进反射性。这些被认为是有效的跨学科和跨学科研究的五个基本单元,尽管第四要素也被认为是将所有其他要素结合在一起的矩阵。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sustainability science》 |2019年第3期|875-888|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany;

    Univ Evora, Inst Ciencias Agr & Ambientais Mediterran ICAAM, Nucleo Mitra, Edificio Principal, Apartado 94, P-7002554 Evora, Portugal;

    Univ Lisbon, Inst Ciencias Sociais, Lisbon, Portugal|Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Geog & Resource Management, Sha Tin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    Univ Lisbon, SOCIUS Inst Super Econ & Gestao, Lisbon, Portugal;

    Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany;

    Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany;

    Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany;

    Univ Dublin, Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;

    Univ Ca Foscari, Dipartimento Studi Umanistici, Dorsoduro 3246, I-30123 Venice, Italy;

    Univ Coll Cork, Coll Arts Celt Studies & Social Sci, Cork, Ireland;

    Univ Geneva, Geneva Sch Social Sci, Geneva, Switzerland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Interdisciplinarity; Transdisciplinarity; Research-practice; Collaboration; INTREPID;

    机译:跨学科;跨学科;研究实践;合作;INTREPID;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号