首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >The fruits of irony: gaining insight into how we make meaning of the world
【24h】

The fruits of irony: gaining insight into how we make meaning of the world

机译:反讽的果实:深入了解我们如何理解世界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many philosophers of education emphasise the impossibility to really ‘solve’ philosophical—and with that, educational—problems these days. Philosophers have been trying to give philosophy a new, constructive turn in the face of this insolvability. This paper focuses on irony-based approaches that try to exploit the very uncertainty of philosophical issues to further philosophical understanding. We will first briefly discuss a few highlights of historical uses of irony as a philosophical tool. Then we concentrate on two different interpretations of irony, formulated by Bransen and Rorty, that aim at gaining insight into how we make meaning of the world, while at the same time recognising that such an understanding would be impossible. After discussing some problematic aspects of these interpretations a third interpretation of irony is developed, based on a third view of the nature of meaning-making. Following these three interpretations, we will discuss their philosophical merits and the different kinds of insight they can produce for philosophy of education.
机译:许多教育哲学家强调,如今无法真正“解决”哲学问题,并且随之而来的是教育问题。面对这种无法解决的问题,哲学家们一直在努力给哲学一个新的,建设性的转变。本文重点研究基于讽刺的方法,这些方法试图利用哲学问题的不确定性来进一步理解哲学。我们将首先简要讨论反讽作为一种哲学工具的历史用法的一些要点。然后,我们集中讨论由布兰森和罗蒂提出的两种不同的反讽解释,其目的是深入了解我们如何理解世界,同时又认识到这种理解是不可能的。在讨论了这些解释的一些有问题的方面之后,根据对意义产生的本质的第三种观点,提出了对讽刺的第三种解释。根据这三种解释,我们将讨论它们的哲学优点以及它们可以为教育哲学带来的不同见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号