首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >The Garching nuclear egg: Teaching contemporary history beyond the linguistic turn
【24h】

The Garching nuclear egg: Teaching contemporary history beyond the linguistic turn

机译:不断前进的核蛋:在语言学转向之外教授当代历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In my paper 1 argue for mobilising recent material heritage at universities in teaching history of contemporary science. Getting your hands dirty in the messy worlds of the laboratory and the storage room, and getting entangled with the commemorative practices of scientists and technicians does not belong to the common experiences of students in history and philosophy of science. Despite the recent material turn in cultural studies, students' engagement with the material world often remains a linguistic exercise, extending at most to an excursion to the sanitised and academically encultured world of the museum exhibit. I contrast this approach by drawing on experiences of taking students to the Atomei, Germany's oldest research reactor at the Garching campus of the Munich University of Technology. Decommissioned since 2000, the installation and its history are still controlled by scientists. Studying contemporary laboratories and their materiality has so far been the domain of sociologists and ethnographers. I argue for opening these spaces to historians of science and engaging with the 'unfinished' material world of contemporary science. Taking the material seriously beyond the linguistic turn and asking students to explore laboratories and other sites of knowledge production challenges existing histories and historiographies. By exploring local university departments and their recent histories through their material heritage, we can observe everyday science and confront scientists and technicians' cultures with those of historians'. By engaging with recent material heritage as historians and archivists, students can make an important contribution to enhancing the awareness about this heritage, its implications for history writing, as well as its documentation and preservation.
机译:在我的论文1中,有人主张动员大学中的最新物质遗产来教授当代科学史。在肮脏的实验室和储藏室里弄脏手,与科学家和技术人员的纪念活动纠缠不清,这不属于学生在历史和科学哲学上的共同经历。尽管最近文化研究出现了实质性的转变,但学生对物质世界的参与通常仍是一种语言练习,最多可扩展到对博物馆展品进行消毒和学术文化化的世界的游览。我通过借鉴将学生带到慕尼黑工业大学Garching校区最古老的研究堆Atomei的经验来对比这种方法。该装置自2000年起退役,至今仍由科学家控制。迄今为止,研究当代实验室及其重要性一直是社会学家和人种学家的领域。我主张为科学史家开放这些空间,并与当代科学的“未完成”物质世界互动。认真对待超出语言学转向的材料并要求学生探索实验室和其他知识生产场所会挑战现有的历史和史学。通过探索当地大学部门及其物质遗产的近期历史,我们可以观察日常科学,并将科学家和技术人员的文化与历史学家的文化相面对。通过作为历史学家和档案工作者与最近的物质遗产接触,学生可以做出重要的贡献,以增强对这一遗产的认识,其对历史写作的意义以及其文献记载和保存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号