...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Electrical technoscience and physics in transition, 1880-1920
【24h】

Electrical technoscience and physics in transition, 1880-1920

机译:转型中的电技术科学和物理,1880-1920年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines the shifting relationship between the academic disciplines of physics and electrical engineering in Britain c.1900, focusing on their shared engagement with new electrical technologies of lighting, power, and telecommunications. It examines these disciplines' common cultures of patenting before the Great War, showing how "electricians" in these intersecting domains used patents to secure financial support and protection for their innovations. However, this common culture was put under strain by the attempts of physicists such as Oliver Lodge, to decouple their electrical researches from technological matters in order to pursue an agenda of so-called "pure science." This campaign was made especially difficult by the strategic focus on "applied science" that emerged during the Great War. We show how a newly legitimized programme of state funding for electrical research both during and after the war led to academic physics and electrical engineering dropping their reliance on patenting by the 1920s, and in the process becoming autonomous sciences-each erasing stories of their former collaboration from disciplinary memories.
机译:本文研究了英国c.1900年物理学与电气工程学学科之间的转移关系,重点是它们与照明,电力和电信新电气技术的共同参与。它研究了这些学科在大战之前的专利共同文化,展示了在这些相交领域中的“电工”如何使用专利来确保其创新的财务支持和保护。但是,这种普遍的文化因诸如奥利弗·洛奇(Oliver Lodge)之类的物理学家的尝试而受到压力,他们试图将其电气研究与技术问题脱钩,以追求所谓的“纯科学”议程。大战期间出现的对“应用科学”的战略关注使这项运动尤其困难。我们展示了在战争期间和战争之后,一项新的合法化的国家电力研究计划如何导致学术物理学和电气工程在1920年代放弃对专利的依赖,并在此过程中成为自治科学-每个都消除了他们以前合作的故事从学科记忆中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号