首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >'Working in a new world': Kuhn, constructivism, and mind-dependence
【24h】

'Working in a new world': Kuhn, constructivism, and mind-dependence

机译:“在新世界工作”:库恩,建构主义和思想依赖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn famously advanced the claim that scientists work in a different world after a scientific revolution. Kuhn's view has been at the center of a philosophical literature that has tried to make sense of his bold claim, by listing Kuhn's view in good company with other seemingly constructivist proposals. The purpose of this paper is to take some steps towards clarifying what sort of constructivism (if any) is in fact at stake in Kuhn's view. To this end, I distinguish between two main (albeit not exclusive) notions of mind-dependence: a semantic notion and an ontological one. I point out that Kuhn's view should be understood as subscribing to a form of semantic mind-dependence, and conclude that semantic mind-dependence does not land us into any worrisome ontological mind-dependence, pace any constructivist reading of Kuhn. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:库恩在《科学革命的结构》中提出了著名的主张,即科学革命后科学家在另一个世界工作。库恩的观点一直是哲学文献的中心,该文献试图通过将库恩的观点与其他看似建构主义的建议很好地结合起来,来理解他的大胆主张。本文的目的是采取一些步骤,以弄清库恩认为实际上是什么样的建构主义(如果有的话)。为此,我区分了两种主要的(虽然不是排他的)心灵依赖概念:语义概念和本体论概念。我指出,库恩的观点应理解为订阅了一种形式的语义思维依赖性,并得出结论,语义思维依赖性不会使我们陷入任何令人担忧的本体论思维依赖性,从而使对建构主义的理解不如库恩。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号