...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Constitutive relevance in cognitive science: The case of eye movements and cognitive mechanisms
【24h】

Constitutive relevance in cognitive science: The case of eye movements and cognitive mechanisms

机译:认知科学中的本构相关性:眼睛运动和认知机制的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper I assess whether the recently proposed "No De-Coupling" (NDC) theory of constitutive relevance in mechanisms is a useful tool to reconstruct constitutive relevance investigations in scientific practice. The NDC theory has been advanced as a framework theoretically superior to the mutual manipulability (MM) account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms but, in contrast to the MM account, has not yet been applied to detailed case studies. I argue that the NDC account is also applicable to empirical practice and that it fares better than the MM account on both theoretical and empirical grounds. I elaborate these claims in terms of applications of the NDC theory to two case studies of cognitive science research on the role of eye movements in mechanisms for cognitive capacities. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我评估了最近提出的机制本构相关性的“无解耦”(NDC)理论是否是在科学实践中重建本构相关性研究的有用工具。 NDC理论已经发展为一种理论上优于机制中本构相关性的互操作性(MM)框架,但与MM相比,它尚未应用于详细的案例研究。我认为NDC帐户也适用于经验实践,并且从理论和经验的角度来看,它都比MM帐户更好。我将NDC理论应用于关于眼动在认知能力机制中的作用的认知科学研究的两个案例研究中详细阐述了这些主张。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号