...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization >Comparison study between MCMC-based and weight-based Bayesian methods for identification of joint distribution
【24h】

Comparison study between MCMC-based and weight-based Bayesian methods for identification of joint distribution

机译:基于MCMC和基于权重的贝叶斯方法识别关节分布的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Bayesian method is widely used to identify a joint distribution, which is modeled by marginal distributions and a copula. The joint distribution can be identified by one-step procedure, which directly tests all candidate joint distributions, or by two-step procedure, which first identifies marginal distributions and then copula. The weight-based Bayesian method using two-step procedure and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based Bayesian method using one-step and two-step procedures were recently developed. In this paper, the one-step weight-based Bayesian method and two-step MCMC-based Bayesian method using the parametric marginal distributions are proposed. Comparison studies among the Bayesian methods have not been thoroughly carried out. In this paper, the weight-based and MCMC-based Bayesian methods using one-step and two-step procedures are compared to see which Bayesian method accurately and efficiently identifies a correct joint distribution through simulation studies. It is validated that the two-step weight-based Bayesian method has the best performance.
机译:贝叶斯方法被广泛用于识别联合分布,该联合分布由边际分布和copula建模。可以通过一步步骤(直接测试所有候选关节分布)来识别关节分布,也可以通过两步过程(首先识别边缘分布,然后识别系脉)来识别关节分布。最近开发了使用两步过程的基于权重的贝叶斯方法和使用一步和两步过程的基于马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)的贝叶斯方法。本文提出了一种基于参数边际分布的基于权重的一步贝叶斯方法和基于两步基于MCMC的贝叶斯方法。贝叶斯方法之间的比较研究尚未彻底进行。在本文中,通过一步法和两步法对基于权重和基于MCMC的贝叶斯方法进行了比较,以通过仿真研究来查看哪种贝叶斯方法能够准确有效地识别正确的关节分布。验证了基于两步权重的贝叶斯方法具有最佳性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号