首页> 外文期刊>Structural equation modeling >Selecting Path Models in SEM: A Comparison of Model Selection Criteria
【24h】

Selecting Path Models in SEM: A Comparison of Model Selection Criteria

机译:在SEM中选择路径模型:模型选择标准的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Model comparison is one useful approach in applications of structural equation modeling. Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are commonly used for selecting an optimal model from the alternatives. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various model selection criteria, including AIC, BIC, and their extensions, in selecting an optimal path model under a wide range of conditions over different compositions of candidate set, distinct values of misspecified parameters, and diverse sample sizes. The chance of selecting an optimal model rose as the values of misspecified parameters and sample sizes increased. The relative performance of AIC and BIC type criteria depended on the magnitudes of the parameter misspecified. The BIC family in general outperformed AIC counterparts unless under small values of omitted parameters and sample sizes, where AIC performed better. Scaled unit information prior BIC (SPBIC) and Haughton's BIC (HBIC) demonstrated the highest accuracy ratios across most of the conditions investigated in this simulation.
机译:模型比较是结构方程建模应用中的一种有用方法。 Akaike的信息标准(AIC)和贝叶斯信息标准(BIC)通常用于从替代方案中选择最佳模型。我们对各种模型选择标准(包括AIC,BIC及其扩展名)进行了全面评估,从而在各种条件下针对候选集的不同组成,错误指定的参数的不同值以及不同的样本量在各种条件下选择最佳路径模型。选择错误的参数值和样本量的值增加,选择最佳模型的机会增加。 AIC和BIC类型标准的相对性能取决于错误指定的参数的大小。除非在省略的参数和样本量较小的情况下,AIC的表现一般较好,否则BIC系列通常会胜过AIC。在此模拟研究的大多数条件下,先验BIC(SPBIC)和Haughton's BIC(HBIC)的标定单位信息显示出最高的准确率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号